BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “house property”+ Section 153Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi604Mumbai370Bangalore297Chennai169Jaipur137Hyderabad114Cochin79Chandigarh56Amritsar49Ahmedabad26Patna23Guwahati22Pune20Visakhapatnam19Nagpur19Rajkot18Indore16Karnataka16Agra14Kolkata11Surat10Kerala7Raipur7Lucknow6Allahabad2Jodhpur2Telangana2Varanasi2SC1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 153A6Section 2502Section 1532Addition to Income2

INDU BALA PORWAL,UDAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRE CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR

In the result, ground no 5, 9 and 11 appeal is also allowed in favor as indicated above

ITA 173/JODH/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur18 Jun 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member), DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

Section 132Section 153Section 153ASection 250

153C of the Act. b. the impugned assessment u/s 153A of the Act. 6. Under the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A), has erred in upholding that: a. Impugned additions of alleged unexplained assets, alleged interest, dividend income in hands of Appellant and against the law. b. foreign bank account operated and controlled

TARUN MURADIA,UDAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1 UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 848/JODH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur23 Jun 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member), DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

Section 132aSection 132tSection 143(2)Section 153ASection 234ASection 250

153C—There was no such statement in present case which could be said to constitute admission by Assessee of failure to record any transaction in accounts of Assessee for AYs in question—Disclosure made in sum was only for year of search and not for earlier years—As already noticed, books of accounts maintained by Assessee in present case