AJMER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,AJMER vs. CIT(EXEMPTION)/ ITO (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR / JODHPUR

In the result, the stay application filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Kul Bharatshri Manish Borad

housing development and town planning, which is the core activity of the appellant in this case also, has been held to be charitable activities within the meaning of Section 2(15) of the Act fully considering the scope of the proviso below S. 2(15). The law as understood and declared thus by the Hon'ble Apex Court shall relate

RAJKUMARI SINGHAL,MOUNT ABU vs. DCIT,. CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result, the appeals of assessee bearing ITA Nos

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

108 to 110/Jodh/2022 A.Ys.: 2013-14 to 2015-16 Rajkumari Singhal, Main Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Market Mount Abu Rajasthan Income Tax, Central [PAN: ALDPS4874J] Circle-1,Jodhpur. (Respondent) (Appellant) Appellant by Sh. Surendra Mehta, Adv. Respondent by Sh. Lovish Kumar, CIT. DR Date of Hearing 19.10.2023 Date of Pronouncement 21.12.2023 I.T.A. Nos. 111 to 112/Jodh/2022 & Ors 2 ORDER

SANJAY SINGHAL,MOUNT ABU vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result, the appeals of assessee bearing ITA Nos

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

108 to 110/Jodh/2022 A.Ys.: 2013-14 to 2015-16 Rajkumari Singhal, Main Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Market Mount Abu Rajasthan Income Tax, Central [PAN: ALDPS4874J] Circle-1,Jodhpur. (Respondent) (Appellant) Appellant by Sh. Surendra Mehta, Adv. Respondent by Sh. Lovish Kumar, CIT. DR Date of Hearing 19.10.2023 Date of Pronouncement 21.12.2023 I.T.A. Nos. 111 to 112/Jodh/2022 & Ors 2 ORDER

RAJKUMARI SINGHAL,MOUNT ABU vs. DCIT,. CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result, the appeals of assessee bearing ITA Nos

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

108 to 110/Jodh/2022 A.Ys.: 2013-14 to 2015-16 Rajkumari Singhal, Main Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Market Mount Abu Rajasthan Income Tax, Central [PAN: ALDPS4874J] Circle-1,Jodhpur. (Respondent) (Appellant) Appellant by Sh. Surendra Mehta, Adv. Respondent by Sh. Lovish Kumar, CIT. DR Date of Hearing 19.10.2023 Date of Pronouncement 21.12.2023 I.T.A. Nos. 111 to 112/Jodh/2022 & Ors 2 ORDER

DCIT, CENTRAL CICLE-1, JODHPUR vs. SANJAY SINGHAL, MOUNT ABU

In the result, the appeals of assessee bearing ITA Nos

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

108 to 110/Jodh/2022 A.Ys.: 2013-14 to 2015-16 Rajkumari Singhal, Main Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Market Mount Abu Rajasthan Income Tax, Central [PAN: ALDPS4874J] Circle-1,Jodhpur. (Respondent) (Appellant) Appellant by Sh. Surendra Mehta, Adv. Respondent by Sh. Lovish Kumar, CIT. DR Date of Hearing 19.10.2023 Date of Pronouncement 21.12.2023 I.T.A. Nos. 111 to 112/Jodh/2022 & Ors 2 ORDER

RAJ KUMARI SINGHAL,MOUNT ABU vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result, the appeals of assessee bearing ITA Nos

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

108 to 110/Jodh/2022 A.Ys.: 2013-14 to 2015-16 Rajkumari Singhal, Main Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Market Mount Abu Rajasthan Income Tax, Central [PAN: ALDPS4874J] Circle-1,Jodhpur. (Respondent) (Appellant) Appellant by Sh. Surendra Mehta, Adv. Respondent by Sh. Lovish Kumar, CIT. DR Date of Hearing 19.10.2023 Date of Pronouncement 21.12.2023 I.T.A. Nos. 111 to 112/Jodh/2022 & Ors 2 ORDER

SANJAY SINGHAL,MOUNT ABU vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result, the appeals of assessee bearing ITA Nos

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

108 to 110/Jodh/2022 A.Ys.: 2013-14 to 2015-16 Rajkumari Singhal, Main Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Market Mount Abu Rajasthan Income Tax, Central [PAN: ALDPS4874J] Circle-1,Jodhpur. (Respondent) (Appellant) Appellant by Sh. Surendra Mehta, Adv. Respondent by Sh. Lovish Kumar, CIT. DR Date of Hearing 19.10.2023 Date of Pronouncement 21.12.2023 I.T.A. Nos. 111 to 112/Jodh/2022 & Ors 2 ORDER

SHRI BHANWAR LAL,JODHPUR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result the appeals of the assessee ITA Nos

property and transactions as recorded on such\nloose paper were false and incorrect. The Ld AO neither found any\nmaterial or evidence as a result of search to corroborate the same nor\nbrought on record any adverse material in contrary to statement &\naffidavits of Shri K.L. Gandhi and other evidence furnished by appellant.\nThe Ld. AR argued that