BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “disallowance”+ Section 80Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai106Delhi71Bangalore63Raipur47Chennai33Surat28Ahmedabad15Kolkata13Indore13Rajkot12Pune11Karnataka7Jaipur7Jodhpur5Varanasi3SC3Telangana3Chandigarh2Lucknow1Amritsar1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 35A27Section 14816Section 801A(7)5Section 115Disallowance5Addition to Income5Section 80J4Section 1394Deduction4Limitation/Time-bar

APNA GHAR ASHRAM,JODHPUR vs. DDIT, CPC / ITO, WARD (EXEMPTION), BANGALORE / JODHPUR

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 730/JODH/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur02 Jun 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Rajendra Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Karni Dan, Addl. CIT(Sr. D.R)
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)

80J(6A) which are similar to the provisions of section 80-IA(7), we feel that the Tribunal has arrived at the correct conclusion that the requirement of filing the audit report along with the return is not mandatory but directory and that if the audit report is filed at any time before the framing of the assessment, the requirement

ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR , JODHPUR vs. JODHPUR HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD., JODHPUR

4
Section 143(1)3
Section 12A2

In the result, the revenue appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 541/JODH/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur26 Jun 2025AY 2016-17
Section 139Section 148Section 35ASection 801A(7)Section 80J

section 801A(7) to file audit report in form 10CCB within prescribed\ntime limit to claim deduction u/s 35AD.\n2. Whether the Id. CIT(A) has erred in observing that in the case of CIT vs.\nG.M. Knitting Industries (P). Ltd. 376 ITR 456, the Hon'ble Supreme Court\nfurther held that even though necessary \\certificate in Form 10CCB along

ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR , JODHPUR vs. JODHPUR HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD., JODHPUR

In the result, the revenue appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 544/JODH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur26 Jun 2025AY 2017-18
Section 139Section 148Section 35ASection 801A(7)Section 80J

80J on the basis\nof the such report.\n3 The Id. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate the fact that in the present case\nthe assessee has failed to offer a satisfactory explanation for his failure to\nsubmit the audit report in Form 10CCB in time.\n4. Whether the Ld. CIT(A) is justified in deleting the disallowance made\nu/s

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1, JODHPUR , JODHPUR vs. JODHPUR HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD., JODHPUR

In the result, the revenue appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 545/JODH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur26 Jun 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon'Ble & Anikesh Banerjee, Hon'Ble

Section 139Section 148Section 35ASection 801A(7)Section 80J

80J on the basis of the such report. 3 The Ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate the fact that in the present case the assessee has failed to offer a satisfactory explanation for his failure to submit the audit report in Form 10CCB in time. 4. Whether the Ld. CIT(A) is justified in deleting the disallowance made

ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR, JODHPUR vs. JODHPUR HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD. , JODHPUR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 540/JODH/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur01 Jul 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon'Ble & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon'Blea.C.I.T., Circle-1, Jodhpur. Revenue By Assessee By Date Of Hearing Date Of Pronouncement

Section 139Section 148Section 35ASection 801A(7)Section 80J

section 801A(7) to file audit report in form 10 CCB within prescribed time limit to claim deduction u/s 35AD. 2. ITA No. 540/Jodh/2024 (Assessment Year 2015-16) 2. Whether the Ide CIT(A) has erred in observing that in the case of CIT vs. G.M. Knitting Industries (P). Ltd. 376 ITR 456, the Hon'ble Supreme Court further held