Search: disallowance | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 80Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi123 Mumbai101 Jaipur58 Bangalore38 Hyderabad29 Chennai25 Kolkata23 Ahmedabad17 Pune16 Chandigarh16 Lucknow15 Cochin13 Surat10 Raipur9 Indore9 Amritsar8 Nagpur6 Telangana5 Patna5 Agra4 Cuttack4 Visakhapatnam3 Jodhpur3 Karnataka2 Varanasi2 Rajkot1 Ranchi1 Panaji1 Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 80I7 Section 69A5 Section 80C5 Section 143(3)3 Section 683 Section 44A3 Deduction3 Disallowance3 Addition to Income3 Section 115B

SHYAM SUNDAR INANI,JODHPUR vs. ITO, WARD, PHALODI

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 675/JODH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur02 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Rajendra Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Karni Dan, Addl. CIT(Sr. D.R)

Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 69ASection 80C

section 80C for LIC premium of Rs.38,320/- was disallowed despite submission of relevant documents; b) The AO erred in computing

DCIT, CIRCLE, PALI vs. SHRI BRIJ BHUSHAN GOYAL, FARIDABAD.

2

Section 143(2)2

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 297/JODH/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur14 Aug 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri Dr. Dipak P. Ripotedcit Vs. Shri Brij Bhushan Circle, Pali., Goyal, Jodhpur. House No. 331, Sector Rajasthan. 16A, Faridabad, Haryana.-121002 Pan/Gir No. : Aawpg8405D Appellant .. Respondent Assessee By : Shri Amit Kothari, Ca. Ar Revenue By : Ms. Nidhi Nair, Jcit -Dr Date Of Hearing 10.08.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 14.08.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale Jm: The Revenue Has Filed The Appeal Against The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) – I, Jodhpur Passed U/S 143(3) & 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

For Appellant: Shri Amit Kothari, CA. ARFor Respondent: Ms. Nidhi Nair, JCIT -DR

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 80Section 80CSection 80DSection 80ISection 80T

80C 1,00,000 7 Deduction u/s 80TTA 1,000 8 Deduction u/s 80D 10,693 9 Total (4+5+6) 1,20,693 10 Balance Income 2,23,31,653 11 Deduction claimed u/s 80IC 1,68,71,111 12 Disallowance u/s 80IC as 1,68,71,111 discussed above in Para number 6 13 Total income

SHRI SUMIT GAHLOT,BHILWARA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BHILWARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 176/JPR/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur24 Mar 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad176/Jodh/2019 (Assessment Year- 2015-16) Vs Shri Sumit Gahlot, The Ito House No.22, Ganesh Ward-1, Colony, Gulpura, Bhilwara Bhilwara (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Bqapg9853L

Section 115BSection 143(2)Section 28(1)Section 44ASection 68Section 80C

disallowance of deduction u/s 80C of Rs.15,217/-. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, alter and/or withdraw any of the grounds of appeal at the time of hearing.” 2.1 At the outset of hearing the Bench noted that there is delay 169 days in filing the appeal by the assessee for which the assessee filed an application for condonation