BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “disallowance”+ Section 801A(3)(ii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai127Delhi99Hyderabad60Ahmedabad36Kolkata29Chennai26Pune19Jaipur16Bangalore15Indore12Rajkot11Patna10Chandigarh8Cuttack7Nagpur6Jodhpur6Dehradun6Lucknow5Raipur5Guwahati4Surat2Amritsar1Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 35A27Section 14816Section 26315Deduction6Section 801A(7)5Section 143(3)5Section 80I5Disallowance5Section 80J4Section 139

NAHAR COLOURS AND COATINHGS PRIVATE LIMITED,UDAIPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOMETAX, UDAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 140/JODH/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur09 Aug 2023AY 2018-19
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 801ASection 80I

801A was 44.25% whereas the NP rate of non-eligible business was only 9.75%. The intention was basically to ascertain and examine as to whether the claim u/s 80IA was legally correct and as to whether the common expenses related to both segment of business had been correctly allocated or there was any diversion of expenses of eligible business

4
Addition to Income4
Limitation/Time-bar4

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1, JODHPUR , JODHPUR vs. JODHPUR HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD., JODHPUR

In the result, the revenue appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 545/JODH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur26 Jun 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon'Ble & Anikesh Banerjee, Hon'Ble

Section 139Section 148Section 35ASection 801A(7)Section 80J

3 The Ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate the fact that in the present case the assessee has failed to offer a satisfactory explanation for his failure to submit the audit report in Form 10CCB in time. 4. Whether the Ld. CIT(A) is justified in deleting the disallowance made u/s 35AD by holding that with regard

ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR , JODHPUR vs. JODHPUR HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD., JODHPUR

In the result, the revenue appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 541/JODH/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur26 Jun 2025AY 2016-17
Section 139Section 148Section 35ASection 801A(7)Section 80J

3,18,81,535/-made on account of disallowance of\ndiscounts by holding that AO no-where in the order has brought on record\nthat the claim made by the appellant was by way of fraud, by ignoring that\nthe onus to prove the genuineness of the expenses is on the assessee who\nhas claimed them.\n7. Whether

ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR , JODHPUR vs. JODHPUR HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD., JODHPUR

In the result, the revenue appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 544/JODH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur26 Jun 2025AY 2017-18
Section 139Section 148Section 35ASection 801A(7)Section 80J

3,18,81,535/-made on account of disallowance of\ndiscounts by holding that AO no-where in the order has brought on record\nthat the claim made by the appellant was by way of fraud, by ignoring that\nthe onus to prove the genuineness of the expenses is on the assessee who\nhas claimed them.\n7. Whether

AJMER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,AJMER vs. CIT(EXEMPTION)/ ITO (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR / JODHPUR

In the result, the stay application filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 89/JODH/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur22 Mar 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Kul Bharatshri Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 263

801A of the Act, either due to lack of enquiry or otherwise, is the original assessment order passed under s. 143(3) r/ws.144C of the Act and not the re-assessment order. Therefore, the period of limitation prescribed under s. 263(2) of the Act would run from the original assessment order. 20. Being conscious of the fact that

ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR, JODHPUR vs. JODHPUR HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD. , JODHPUR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 540/JODH/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur01 Jul 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon'Ble & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon'Blea.C.I.T., Circle-1, Jodhpur. Revenue By Assessee By Date Of Hearing Date Of Pronouncement

Section 139Section 148Section 35ASection 801A(7)Section 80J

II, Opp. AIIMS Campus, Jodhpur - 342005. PAN No. AACCJ9336P Smt. Runi Pal, CIT-DR. Shri Amit Kothari, C.A. 01.05.2025. 01.07.2025. ORDER PER DR. MITHA LAL MEENA, A.M.: The captioned appeal has been filed by the revenue against the order of the Id. National Faceless Appeal Centre [NFAC/CIT(A)], Delhi dated 03.05.2024 in respect of Assessment Year 2015-16 where