BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 54Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi50Pune25Ahmedabad22Indore20Mumbai17Bangalore17Surat16Jaipur13Chennai11Raipur10Rajkot6Chandigarh5Nagpur5Hyderabad5Kolkata3Agra2Amritsar2Cuttack2Jabalpur2Jodhpur2Patna1Dehradun1SC1Cochin1Varanasi1Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 54F6Section 1544Section 143(1)4Section 2342Section 143(3)2Deduction2Addition to Income2

SUNIL PAGARIA,UDAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-2(1), UDAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 198/JODH/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur09 Oct 2023AY 2013-14
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 234Section 54F

disallowed to the extent, vide rectification u/s 154. (3) Alternatively: how assessment completed u/s 143 (3), proceeding u/s 154 is not amenable? Copy of reply dated 04/05/2018 attached at Pg No 54 to 97. Yet the Ld. AO did not consider without considering case laws furnished. In first appeal, it has been argued on similar line like:  Provision of section

DEVRAJ BEHARNANI,JODHPUR vs. ACIT, C-3, JODHPUR/ CPC, BENGALURU, JODHPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 149/JODH/2022[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur20 Mar 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad149/Jodh/2022 (Assessment Year- 2020-21) Shri Devraj Beharnani Vs The Acit Atmaram Building Circle-3 Outside Sojati Gate Jodhpur Jodhpur (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Adtpb 0305 M

Section 143(1)Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

Section 36(1) and 54B of the I.T. Act, it is clear that the employee’s contribution can be allowed as a deduction only if it has been paid within the prescribed due dates under the relevant welfare funds and this position of law is and has always been the case and the clarifications brought about the amendment clearly apply