BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “disallowance”+ Section 246(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai641Delhi467Bangalore184Chennai140Kolkata139Jaipur105Ahmedabad72Chandigarh60Pune49Raipur46Indore35Cochin34Hyderabad32Lucknow31Nagpur20Cuttack20Surat19SC14Karnataka14Visakhapatnam14Rajkot13Amritsar9Jodhpur8Agra6Varanasi5Allahabad5Telangana4Patna4Panaji2Guwahati2Jabalpur2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 26310Section 153A8Section 143(3)7Section 107Section 1545Disallowance5Addition to Income5Section 80P(4)4Section 80P(2)(a)4Section 143(1)

OCHHAB LAL JAIN,UDAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 429/JODH/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur29 May 2025AY 2016-17
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 69A

disallowance by dealing with the same in the body of order of assessment as the same was the subject matter of the appeal as per the grounds of the appeal raised before him. In other words, the CIT(A) has a power of enhancement in respect of such item or items of income which has been dealt with

HARMONY PLASTICS PVT.LTD., ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, UDAIUR

4
Deduction4
Limitation/Time-bar2

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 180/JODH/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur21 Mar 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad180/Jodh/2019 (Assessment Year- 2015-16) M/S. Harmony Plastics Pvt Ltd. V The Acit S F-335-339, Bhamashah Industrial Circle-1 Area, Kaladwas, Udaipur Uddaipur (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabch 5399 D

Section 143(3)Section 32Section 32(1)Section 32(1)(iia)Section 32(2)(iia)

disallowance of allowance of balance 50% additional depreciation on new plant & Machinery purchased and put to use during the IInd Half of A.Y. 2014-15 on the alleged ground that in terms of clause (iia) of Section 32(1), addl. Depreciation is available in year in which machinery is new and first put to use and not for any succeeding

ITO, WARD-1(5), JODHPUR vs. PUSTIKAR SAKH SAHAKARI SAMITI LTD., JODHPUR

ITA 395/JODH/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur07 Jul 2023AY 2016-17
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 56Section 80(2)(a)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

1)(cca) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1946. 2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(Appeals) is justified in law in holding that the assessee is not cooperative bank by ignoring that the assessee fulfilled conditions applicable to cooperative banks as per Part V of the Banking Regulation

ITO, WARD-1(5), JODHPUR vs. M/S. PUSHTIKAR SAKH SAHAKARI SAMITI LTD., JODHPUR

ITA 90/JODH/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur07 Jul 2023AY 2017-18
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 56Section 80(2)(a)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

1)(cca) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1946. 2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(Appeals) is justified in law in holding that the assessee is not cooperative bank by ignoring that the assessee fulfilled conditions applicable to cooperative banks as per Part V of the Banking Regulation

BHARAT MATA MANDIR NYAS,BANSWARA vs. ITO, EXEMPTION, UDAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 163/JODH/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur06 Dec 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 10Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 250Section 80G

Section 10. The test prescribed under the aforesaid provision is not the income of the educational education. It is the aggregate annual receipts of such educational institution that is prescribed at Rs.1 crore. Therefore, irrespective of the expenditure incurred by those institutions, the exemption is based on the total receipts. Even if the word "aggregate" has to be understood

ASHIANA BUILDPROP PRIVATE LIMITED,UDAIPUR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR

ITA 706/JODH/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur26 May 2025AY 2013-14
Section 132Section 145(3)Section 153ASection 234ASection 250

1,26,65,229/-(8194403+4470826)\ninstead of Rs.81,94,403/- declared by the assessee. Accordingly he has made\naddition of Rs.44,70,826/- in the A.Y. 2013-14. Same type of additions have also\nbeen made in the A.Y. 2014-15 to 2016-17 asper the above chart.\n6.2. Further

P I INDUSTRIES LIMITED ,UDAIPUR vs. PR. CIT, UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR

ITA 4/JODH/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur08 Sept 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Vikram Singh Yadavassessment Year:2016-17 Pi Industries Limited, Vs. Pr.Cit, Udaisagar Road, Udaipur. Udaipur-313001. Pan No. Aabcp 2183 M

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 263Section 32ASection 35(1)(iv)Section 80ISection 92C

1) had been duly and fully complied with and all the details and information were duly submitted and examined during the course of assessment proceedings. 8. The assessee replying on the decision of Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Vikas Polymers (2010) 236 CTR (Del) 476 mentioned that mere absence of the reference

BHOOP SINGH POONIA,NOHAR vs. ITO WARD, NOHAR, NOHAR

ITA 405/JODH/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur17 Jun 2025AY 2014-15
Section 133A

disallowance of excess stock claimed by the\nassessee.\n5. The brief facts of the case are that assessee has filed his\nreturn of income on 18.09.2015 in response to a notice u/s\n142(1) by ITO, Ward Nohar. In this return, assessee has\ndeclared an income of Rs. 72,61,700/- and agriculture income\nof Rs.3,63,246