BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 194C(7)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai515Delhi371Kolkata369Chennai189Bangalore188Ahmedabad60Hyderabad42Indore35Jaipur34Raipur33Rajkot31Nagpur14Pune13Amritsar13Karnataka13Visakhapatnam12Cuttack12Surat12Cochin11Chandigarh11Panaji10Lucknow9Allahabad9Guwahati8Ranchi7Kerala7Patna7Calcutta4Dehradun4Jodhpur3SC3Agra2Jabalpur1Gauhati1Uttarakhand1Varanasi1Rajasthan1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 1547Section 407Section 1944Section 143(3)3Section 145(3)2Section 1472Deduction2TDS2Disallowance2Addition to Income

SHRI KAILASH CHANDRA,BARMER vs. ITO,WARD-1, BARMER

In the result, appeal of the assesse is allowed

ITA 119/JODH/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur22 Sept 2023AY 2014-15
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 194Section 194ISection 40Section 40a

7. In the instant case, it is observed that the Assessing Officer observed that Rs.9,60,672/- has been shown as outstanding liability on account of service tax in the balance sheet and finding that there was no evidence available of payment of the same with the time limit prescribed u/s.139(1) of the Act, added the same

ARAVALI TRADING COMPANY,NAGAUR vs. ITO, WARD-1, NAGAUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

2
Natural Justice2
ITA 122/JODH/2022[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur21 Mar 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Kul Bharatshri Manish Boradaravali Trading Company, Vs Ito, 154, Near Bus Stand, Ward-1, Nagour Merta City, Nagaur, (Rajasthan) Rajasthan-341510 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabfa7735M Assessee By Shri Kishan Goyal, Ca Revenue By Shri S.M.Joshi, Jcit Dr Date Of Hearing 20/03/2023 Date Of 21/03/2023 Pronouncement

Section 145(3)Section 40

7. DISALLOWANC U/s 40 (a) (ia)... Rs. 64,177/- a. That Authorities below erred in law and in facts while applying section 40 (a) (ia) of the I T Act and disallowed Rs. 64,177/-. 3 | P a g e b. That provisions of Sections 40(a)(ia) of the I T Act is not applicable in the facts & circumstances

LAXMAN SINGH SOLANKI (FIRM),PALI vs. ITO, , PALI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 795/JODH/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur30 Oct 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Amit Kothari, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Kumar Gehlot, Addl. CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 194ASection 194C

194C). As there was no response to various statutory notices, the Assessing Officer completed the assessment ex parte under section 147 r.w.s. 144/144B on 27.03.2022 determining income at Rs.1,03,78,887/- by disallowing the said expenses. 4. Against the order of the Ld. AO The appeal before the CIT(A) was filed with a delay of 129 days, supported