BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 194A(3)(iv)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai87Bangalore74Delhi66Chandigarh35Chennai31Kolkata31Ahmedabad23Jaipur19Pune16Hyderabad15Rajkot15Visakhapatnam14Cuttack11Surat8Raipur7Cochin6Indore4Nagpur4Allahabad3Ranchi3Jodhpur2SC2Panaji2Guwahati1Lucknow1

Key Topics

Section 404Section 143(3)2Section 67(1)2Section 332Section 352Section 732Section 562Section 5A2Exemption2Penalty

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR vs. M/S. ADARSH CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. , SIROHI.

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes, as indicated above

ITA 212/JODH/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur30 Oct 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Prakul Khurana, Advocate and Shri Mukesh Soni, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Runi Pal, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 33Section 35Section 40Section 56Section 5ASection 67(1)Section 73

iv) Bye-law 25: deposits/loans limit (10×) said to be unlawfully invoked, presence of alleged benami members; (v) Bye-law 52: shareholding linkage (5%/2.5%) vis-à-vis borrowings allegedly not complied; diversion of loan funds to share capital alleged. C. Alleged violations of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (i) Section 56 r.w.s. 5(ccv)/(ccvi): primary co-operative bank

2

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR vs. M/S. ADARSH CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. , SIROHI.

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes, as indicated above

ITA 211/JODH/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur30 Oct 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Prakul Khurana, Advocate and Shri Mukesh Soni, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Runi Pal, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 33Section 35Section 40Section 56Section 5ASection 67(1)Section 73

iv) Bye-law 25: deposits/loans limit (10×) said to be unlawfully invoked, presence of alleged benami members; (v) Bye-law 52: shareholding linkage (5%/2.5%) vis-à-vis borrowings allegedly not complied; diversion of loan funds to share capital alleged. C. Alleged violations of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (i) Section 56 r.w.s. 5(ccv)/(ccvi): primary co-operative bank