BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

23 results for “disallowance”+ Section 17(1)(va)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi744Mumbai402Kolkata337Jaipur270Bangalore243Chennai214Ahmedabad154Chandigarh111Raipur101Pune87Hyderabad73Agra65Nagpur65Amritsar60Surat50Lucknow49Indore46Guwahati23Jodhpur23Cochin18Cuttack18Visakhapatnam15Rajkot12Varanasi11Ranchi7Allahabad6Karnataka6Dehradun4SC4Rajasthan3Jabalpur3Patna2Telangana2Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)51Section 36(1)(va)23Addition to Income20Section 143(1)17Disallowance14Section 139(1)13Section 153A9Section 1459Section 1398

M/S TARUN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,WARD NO.24, NEAR BHAGAT SINGH CHOWK, SURATGARH vs. CPC, BANGALORE/ ITO, WARD-1, SRIGANGANAGAR, SRIGANGANAGAR

In the result, appeals are dismissed

ITA 109/JODH/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur21 Sept 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Vice- & Dr. Brr Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. P.C. Parwal, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Rajeev Mohan, JCIT-DR
Section 10ASection 139Section 142Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 36(1)(va)

disallowance of such amount paid beyond the due date, as it is in contravention of section 36(1)(va) of the Act, while computing the total income in the return of income. Instead of doing that, the assessee has claimed deduction of the amount under section 36(1)(va) of the Act. Thus, in our considered opinion, the adjustment clearly

Showing 1–20 of 23 · Page 1 of 2

Section 2637
Deduction3
Rectification u/s 1542

M/S TARUN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,WARD NO.24, NEAR BHAGAT SINGH CHOWK, SURATGARH vs. CPC, BANGALORE/ ITO, WARD-1, SRIGANGANAGAR , SRIGANGANAGAR

In the result, appeals are dismissed

ITA 108/JODH/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur21 Sept 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Vice- & Dr. Brr Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. P.C. Parwal, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Rajeev Mohan, JCIT-DR
Section 10ASection 139Section 142Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 36(1)(va)

disallowance of such amount paid beyond the due date, as it is in contravention of section 36(1)(va) of the Act, while computing the total income in the return of income. Instead of doing that, the assessee has claimed deduction of the amount under section 36(1)(va) of the Act. Thus, in our considered opinion, the adjustment clearly

PUSHAPRAJ KOTHARI,JASOL vs. ACIT, CIRCLE, BARMER, BARMER

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 111/JODH/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur25 Jan 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri N.K.Saini & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastavaassessment Years : 2018-19 Puspapraj Kothari Vs. The Acit, Yashwal, Nakoda Road, Jasol, Barmer Circle, 344024 Barmer Pan No: Aaupk1365N Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. S.M. Joshi, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43

disallowed under section 43B read with section 36(1)(va) of the Act. 17. We further note that though the ld. CIT(A) has not disputed

MONA MARBLES PVT. LD. ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT/DCIT, CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result, the captioned appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 117/JODH/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur18 Jan 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri N.K.Saini & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastavahearing Though Video Conferencing

For Appellant: Shri Amit Kothari, CAFor Respondent: Sh. S.M. Joshi, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 2Section 36(1)(va)

disallowed under section 43B read with section 36(1)(va) of the Act. 17. We further note that though the ld. CIT(A) has not disputed

MONA MARBLES PVT. LTD. ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT/DCIT, CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result, the captioned appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 139/JODH/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur18 Jan 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri N.K.Saini & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastavahearing Though Video Conferencing

For Appellant: Shri Amit Kothari, CAFor Respondent: Sh. S.M. Joshi, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 2Section 36(1)(va)

disallowed under section 43B read with section 36(1)(va) of the Act. 17. We further note that though the ld. CIT(A) has not disputed

MEGA TEX PRINTS,PALI vs. DCIT, CPC, BANGALORE / ITO, WARD-1, PALI

In the result, the captioned appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 105/JODH/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur18 Jan 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri N.K.Saini & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastavahearing Though Video Conferencing

For Appellant: Shri Amit Kothari, CAFor Respondent: Sh. S.M. Joshi, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 2Section 36(1)(va)

disallowed under section 43B read with section 36(1)(va) of the Act. 17. We further note that though the ld. CIT(A) has not disputed

MEGA TEX PRINTS,PALI vs. DCIT, CPC, BANGALORE / ITO, WARD-1, PALI

In the result, the captioned appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 106/JODH/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur18 Jan 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri N.K.Saini & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastavahearing Though Video Conferencing

For Appellant: Shri Amit Kothari, CAFor Respondent: Sh. S.M. Joshi, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 2Section 36(1)(va)

disallowed under section 43B read with section 36(1)(va) of the Act. 17. We further note that though the ld. CIT(A) has not disputed

AKBAR MOHAMMAD,NAGAUR vs. ITO, WARD-3(3), JODHPUR

The appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 108/JODH/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur25 Jan 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri N.K.Saini & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastavahearing Though Video Conferencing

For Appellant: Shri Manoj Gupta, CAFor Respondent: Sh. S.M. Joshi, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 154Section 36(1)(va)

disallowed under section 43B read with section 36(1)(va) of the Act. 17. We further note that though the ld. CIT(A) has not disputed

AKBAR MOHAMMAD,NAGAUR vs. ITO, WARD-3(3), JODHPUR

The appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 109/JODH/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur25 Jan 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri N.K.Saini & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastavahearing Though Video Conferencing

For Appellant: Shri Manoj Gupta, CAFor Respondent: Sh. S.M. Joshi, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 154Section 36(1)(va)

disallowed under section 43B read with section 36(1)(va) of the Act. 17. We further note that though the ld. CIT(A) has not disputed

THE LAKE PALACE HOTELS & MOTELSPRIVATE LIMITED,UDAIPUR vs. PCIT,CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 52/JODH/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur27 Sept 2023AY 2017-18
Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263Section 36(1)(va)Section 43

va) r.w.s. 2(24)(x) after the prescribed time under relevant PF Act. Submissions (1) Disallowance under section 14A of the I T Act: (i) With regard to your honor’s invoking revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 of the I.T. Act, we humbly submit that your honor has duly accepted and stated that AO has made a query with reference

NAHAR COLOURS AND COATINHGS PRIVATE LIMITED,UDAIPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOMETAX, UDAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 140/JODH/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur09 Aug 2023AY 2018-19
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 801ASection 80I

disallowance of Rs. 15,24,003/- in terms of section 36(1)(va) r.w.s. 2(24)(x) of the Act the issue was covered based on the jurisdictional high court decision and therefore, the issue was debatable and law does not permit the review of each every order after the same is considered and decided based

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR vs. M/S MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD., UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 169/JODH/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur12 Oct 2023AY 2018-19
Section 143(3)Section 145Section 153A

va President ITA No. CITA- Udaipur-2/18356/2019-20 Industries on 20 April, 1999 wherein it has been held as under:- "The entire sales could not have been added as income of the assessee for the assessment year in question but only to the extent the estimated profits embedded in the sales for which the net profit rate was adopted entailing

MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 139/JODH/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur12 Oct 2023AY 2012-13
Section 143(3)Section 145Section 153A

va President ITA No. CITA- Udaipur-2/18356/2019-20 Industries on 20 April, 1999 wherein it has been held as under:- "The entire sales could not have been added as income of the assessee for the assessment year in question but only to the extent the estimated profits embedded in the sales for which the net profit rate was adopted entailing

MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 142/JODH/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur12 Oct 2023AY 2016-17
Section 143(3)Section 145Section 153A

va President ITA No. CITA- Udaipur-2/18356/2019-20 Industries on 20 April, 1999 wherein it has been held as under:- "The entire sales could not have been added as income of the assessee for the assessment year in question but only to the extent the estimated profits embedded in the sales for which the net profit rate was adopted entailing

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR vs. M/S MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD., UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 167/JODH/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur12 Oct 2023AY 2016-17
Section 143(3)Section 145Section 153A

va President ITA No. CITA- Udaipur-2/18356/2019-20 Industries on 20 April, 1999 wherein it has been held as under:- "The entire sales could not have been added as income of the assessee for the assessment year in question but only to the extent the estimated profits embedded in the sales for which the net profit rate was adopted entailing

MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 143/JODH/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur12 Oct 2023AY 2017-18
Section 143(3)Section 145Section 153A

va President ITA No. CITA- Udaipur-2/18356/2019-20 Industries on 20 April, 1999 wherein it has been held as under:- "The entire sales could not have been added as income of the assessee for the assessment year in question but only to the extent the estimated profits embedded in the sales for which the net profit rate was adopted entailing

MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 140/JODH/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur12 Oct 2023AY 2014-15
Section 143(3)Section 145Section 153A

va President ITA No. CITA- Udaipur-2/18356/2019-20 Industries on 20 April, 1999 wherein it has been held as under:- "The entire sales could not have been added as income of the assessee for the assessment year in question but only to the extent the estimated profits embedded in the sales for which the net profit rate was adopted entailing

MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 144/JODH/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur12 Oct 2023AY 2018-19
Section 143(3)Section 145Section 153A

va President ITA No. CITA- Udaipur-2/18356/2019-20 Industries on 20 April, 1999 wherein it has been held as under:- "The entire sales could not have been added as income of the assessee for the assessment year in question but only to the extent the estimated profits embedded in the sales for which the net profit rate was adopted entailing

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR vs. M/S MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD., UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 168/JODH/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur12 Oct 2023AY 2017-18
Section 143(3)Section 145Section 153A

va President ITA No. CITA- Udaipur-2/18356/2019-20 Industries on 20 April, 1999 wherein it has been held as under:- "The entire sales could not have been added as income of the assessee for the assessment year in question but only to the extent the estimated profits embedded in the sales for which the net profit rate was adopted entailing

MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 141/JODH/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur12 Oct 2023AY 2015-16
Section 143(3)Section 145Section 153A

va President ITA No. CITA- Udaipur-2/18356/2019-20 Industries on 20 April, 1999 wherein it has been held as under:- "The entire sales could not have been added as income of the assessee for the assessment year in question but only to the extent the estimated profits embedded in the sales for which the net profit rate was adopted entailing