BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 144Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai629Delhi361Ahmedabad221Pune190Bangalore168Hyderabad145Chennai143Jaipur91Kolkata75Chandigarh73Rajkot63Cochin59Visakhapatnam59Surat48Indore47Raipur41Lucknow32Agra23Nagpur20Amritsar12Patna10Dehradun9Guwahati8Panaji6Jabalpur6Cuttack6Varanasi3Jodhpur3Ranchi1Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 1479Section 1485Section 142(1)5Section 143(2)4Section 69A2Addition to Income2Limitation/Time-bar2

LAXMAN SINGH SOLANKI (FIRM),PALI vs. ITO, , PALI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 795/JODH/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur30 Oct 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Amit Kothari, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Kumar Gehlot, Addl. CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 194ASection 194C

sections 148, 142(1) and 144B. 7.1 The medical certificate relied upon was issued nearly a month after the assessment order and prescribed only 11 days’ rest, which could not justify prolonged inaction. Moreover, the firm had multiple e-mail addresses and other partners, hence the plea of illness could not be accepted as “sufficient cause”. He further submitted that

MANGILAL DATLA,BANSWARA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD BANSWARA, BANSWARA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed, both on legal issue\nas well as on facts

ITA 304/JODH/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur25 Jun 2025AY 2017-18
Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 69A

144B of the Act. As such, I am of the\nview that the appellant should be given full opportunity to represent its case, to produce all the\nnecessary evidence which the appellant wishes to rely upon and after considering the entire\nsubmissions of the appellant, the Ld.AO should pass the fresh assessment order. Considering the\nfacts and circumstances

DAWOODI BOHRA JAMAT,UDAIPUR vs. ITO WARD EXEMPTION UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 425/JODH/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur29 May 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member), DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 69

144B as the assessment order was not passed u/s 144. Hence the order of the ld. CIT(A) are bad in law, invalid, illegal and on facts of the case, for and various other reasons and hence the same may kindly be quashed. 3.1 Rs. 75,00,000/-: The ld. AO has grossly erred in law as well