M/S TARUN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,WARD NO.24, NEAR BHAGAT SINGH CHOWK, SURATGARH vs. CPC, BANGALORE/ ITO, WARD-1, SRIGANGANAGAR , SRIGANGANAGAR

In the result, appeals are dismissed

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Vice- & Dr. Brr Kumar

143. (1) Where a return has been made under section 139, or in response to a notice under sub-section (1) of section 142, such return shall be processed in the following manner, namely:— (a) the total income or loss shall be computed after making the following adjustments, namely:— (i) any arithmetical error in the return; (ii) an incorrect claim

NAHAR COLOURS AND COATINHGS PRIVATE LIMITED,UDAIPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOMETAX, UDAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

II) Vs. Goetze(India) Ltd. (A.Y. 2000-01), wherein it was held as under:- "28. Commissioner in her order under Section 263 on the second aspect has recorded that the Assessing Officer had failed to disallow expenditure in respect of exempt income as per the mandate of Section 14A of the Act. Commissioner held that the said provision was applicable

SUSHIL KUMAR MARLECHA,PALI vs. DEPUTY/ASSTT, CIT (CPC-TDS) / ITO, TDS-1,, GHAZIABAD / JODHPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Its Hearing Before Your Honour.”

section should be construed strictly and reasonably. The Bombay High Court in the case of Dattatraya Gopal Shette vs. CIT (1984) 41 CTR (Bom) 393 : (1984) 150 ITR 460 (Bom), has also taken the same view. The Bombay High Court was dealing with a case where an application for renewal of registration was not signed by one of the partners

AJMER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,AJMER vs. CIT(EXEMPTION)/ ITO (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR / JODHPUR

In the result, the stay application filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Kul Bharatshri Manish Borad

143(3) dated 12.12.2019 (BRAE. 49j-erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue vide impugned Order u/s 263 dated 30.03.2022, in the following words: 5 | P a g e "4.1 Further assessee also submitted reply dated 16.03.2022 wherein the assessee has stated that it is undisputedly registered u/s 12AA of the Act and eligible for exemption

M/S. SHREE TIRUPATI ASSOCIATES,BHILWARA vs. ITO, BHILWARA

143 (3) on 29.01.2014 and assessed at Rs. 6,82,506.00 by making addition of Rs. 6,50,000.00 u/s 40 A(3) on account of cash payment for purchases of two land as stock in trade. The appellant preferred appeal before the CIT (A). The hon’ble CIT (A), Ajmer without appreciating the fact and circumstances of the case

SHRI GAUTAM SHARMA,JODHPUR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JODHPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: : Shri Ramesh C.Sharmavk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 120/Jodh/2019 Fu/Kzkj.K O"Kz@Assessment Year : 2012-13 Cuke Shri Gautam Sharma The Dcit Vs. 221-222, Shyam Nagar, Scheme, Pali Central Circle Link Road, Jodhpur Jodhpur Lfkk;H Ys[Kk La-@Thvkbzvkj La-@Pan/Gir No.: Awdps 1276 K Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respondent Fu/Kzkfjrh Dh Vksj Ls@ Assessee By : Shri Amit Kothari, Ca Jktlo Dh Vksj Ls@Revenue By: Shri Abhimanyu Yadav, Jcit-Dr Lquokbz Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Hearing : 29/06/2020 ?Kks"K.Kk Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Pronouncement : 04/09/2020 Vkns'K@ Order Per Ramesh C. Sharma, Am This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A)-2, Udaipur Dated 12-02-2019 For The Assessment Year 2012-13, In The Matter Of Order Passed U/S 147/ R.W.S. 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. 2.1 Due To Prevailing Covid-19 Pandemic Condition, The Hearing Of The Appeal Is Concluded Through Video Conference. The Only Grievance Of The Assessee Relates To Disallowance Of Rs.40.57 Lacs Paid Towards Purchase Of Land, By Invoking The Provisions Of Section 40A(3) Of The Act.

143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2.1 Due to prevailing COVID-19 pandemic condition, the hearing of the appeal is concluded through video conference. The only grievance of the assessee relates to disallowance of Rs.40.57 lacs paid towards purchase of land, by invoking the provisions of Section 40A(3) of the Act. ITA 120/Jodh/2019 Shri Gautam Sharma

THE LAKE PALACE HOTELS & MOTELSPRIVATE LIMITED,UDAIPUR vs. PCIT,CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

143(3) vide order dated 28/12/2019 after thoroughly considering the reply furnished by the assessee at a total income of Rs.10,85,93,969/- by making following disallowances: (i) U/s 2(22)(e) Rs.3,70,40,305/- (ii) U/s 36(1)(iii) Rs.1,18,44,224/- (iii) Aircraft expenses Rs. 8,99,000/- Grounds for proposed revision

PUSHP RAJ BOHRA,JALORE vs. PR. CIT – 1, JODHPUR, JODHPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon'Ble & Shri Udayan Das Gupta, Hon'Ble

143(3) in considering detailed submissions and documentary evidence in support of agricultural income shown at Rs. 58,17,777/-, warrant the Ld. PCIT to hold it erroneous in so far as it is prejudicial to the interest of revenue. In the present case, the learned CIT exercised his revisionary powers under section 263 of the Act. Let's refer

MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

143(2) was issued in the case on 20.02.2019 which was duly served on the assessee on 20.02.2019. Mewar Hospital Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT 5. First we would like to take up year wise appeal filed by the assessee. The relevant facts in ITA No. 139/Jodh/2022 for A. Y. 2012- 13 is that based on the seized material

MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

143(2) was issued in the case on 20.02.2019 which was duly served on the assessee on 20.02.2019. Mewar Hospital Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT 5. First we would like to take up year wise appeal filed by the assessee. The relevant facts in ITA No. 139/Jodh/2022 for A. Y. 2012- 13 is that based on the seized material

MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

143(2) was issued in the case on 20.02.2019 which was duly served on the assessee on 20.02.2019. Mewar Hospital Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT 5. First we would like to take up year wise appeal filed by the assessee. The relevant facts in ITA No. 139/Jodh/2022 for A. Y. 2012- 13 is that based on the seized material

MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

143(2) was issued in the case on 20.02.2019 which was duly served on the assessee on 20.02.2019. Mewar Hospital Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT 5. First we would like to take up year wise appeal filed by the assessee. The relevant facts in ITA No. 139/Jodh/2022 for A. Y. 2012- 13 is that based on the seized material

MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

143(2) was issued in the case on 20.02.2019 which was duly served on the assessee on 20.02.2019. Mewar Hospital Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT 5. First we would like to take up year wise appeal filed by the assessee. The relevant facts in ITA No. 139/Jodh/2022 for A. Y. 2012- 13 is that based on the seized material

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR vs. M/S MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD., UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

143(2) was issued in the case on 20.02.2019 which was duly served on the assessee on 20.02.2019. Mewar Hospital Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT 5. First we would like to take up year wise appeal filed by the assessee. The relevant facts in ITA No. 139/Jodh/2022 for A. Y. 2012- 13 is that based on the seized material

MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

143(2) was issued in the case on 20.02.2019 which was duly served on the assessee on 20.02.2019. Mewar Hospital Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT 5. First we would like to take up year wise appeal filed by the assessee. The relevant facts in ITA No. 139/Jodh/2022 for A. Y. 2012- 13 is that based on the seized material

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR vs. M/S MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD., UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

143(2) was issued in the case on 20.02.2019 which was duly served on the assessee on 20.02.2019. Mewar Hospital Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT 5. First we would like to take up year wise appeal filed by the assessee. The relevant facts in ITA No. 139/Jodh/2022 for A. Y. 2012- 13 is that based on the seized material

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR vs. M/S MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD., UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

143(2) was issued in the case on 20.02.2019 which was duly served on the assessee on 20.02.2019. Mewar Hospital Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT 5. First we would like to take up year wise appeal filed by the assessee. The relevant facts in ITA No. 139/Jodh/2022 for A. Y. 2012- 13 is that based on the seized material

RAJ KUMAR GOLECHA,PALI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JODHPUR, AAYKAR BHAWAN, JODHPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

143 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Search and seizure – Assessment in case of (Conditions precedent) in Whether object of section 153A is to bring under tax undisclosed income which is found during course of search or pursuant to search or requisition; therefore, only in a case where undisclosed income is found on basis of incriminating material, Assessing Officer would

M/S. DEEPAK & COMPANY INFRA PVT. LTD. ,SRI GANGANAGAR vs. ITO, WARD-1, SRIGANAGNAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

disallowed by the Assessing Officer on the grounds that such infrastructural facility is not owned, wholly or partly, by the taxpayer which is an essential condition for claiming depreciation and further right to collect toll does not fall in any of the categories of 'intangible assets' specified in sub-clause(ii) of sub-section (1) of section