BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

15 results for “disallowance”+ Section 124(3)(a)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,162Mumbai1,064Bangalore346Chennai258Kolkata220Ahmedabad169Jaipur128Hyderabad120Pune78Chandigarh76Raipur72Cochin64Rajkot61Indore52Surat46Calcutta35Cuttack32Lucknow31Visakhapatnam27Ranchi25Allahabad23Karnataka19Amritsar19Nagpur16Jodhpur15Guwahati13SC12Varanasi9Panaji6Telangana6Dehradun5Agra5Patna3Jabalpur1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)50Addition to Income13Section 153A9Section 1459Section 2638Section 1398Section 80I5Section 1485Section 143(1)4Deduction

NAHAR COLOURS AND COATINHGS PRIVATE LIMITED,UDAIPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOMETAX, UDAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 140/JODH/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur09 Aug 2023AY 2018-19
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 801ASection 80I

disallowance of Rs. 15,24,003/- in terms of section 36(1)(va) r.w.s. 2(24)(x) of the Act the issue was covered based on the jurisdictional high court decision and therefore, the issue was debatable and law does not permit the review of each every order after the same is considered and decided based

M/S TARUN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,WARD NO.24, NEAR BHAGAT SINGH CHOWK, SURATGARH vs. CPC, BANGALORE/ ITO, WARD-1, SRIGANGANAGAR, SRIGANGANAGAR

4
Disallowance4
Set Off of Losses2

In the result, appeals are dismissed

ITA 109/JODH/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur21 Sept 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Vice- & Dr. Brr Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. P.C. Parwal, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Rajeev Mohan, JCIT-DR
Section 10ASection 139Section 142Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 36(1)(va)

disallowance does not come into play when the payment is made well before the date of filing the income tax return under section 139(1). Viewed thus also, the impugned adjustment is vitiated in law, and we must delete the same for this short reason as well. 10. In view of the detailed discussions above, we are of the considered

M/S TARUN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,WARD NO.24, NEAR BHAGAT SINGH CHOWK, SURATGARH vs. CPC, BANGALORE/ ITO, WARD-1, SRIGANGANAGAR , SRIGANGANAGAR

In the result, appeals are dismissed

ITA 108/JODH/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur21 Sept 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Vice- & Dr. Brr Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. P.C. Parwal, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Rajeev Mohan, JCIT-DR
Section 10ASection 139Section 142Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 36(1)(va)

disallowance does not come into play when the payment is made well before the date of filing the income tax return under section 139(1). Viewed thus also, the impugned adjustment is vitiated in law, and we must delete the same for this short reason as well. 10. In view of the detailed discussions above, we are of the considered

MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 139/JODH/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur12 Oct 2023AY 2012-13
Section 143(3)Section 145Section 153A

124 TTJ (Jd) 674 " CIT vs. Kabul Chawla (2015) 281 CTR (Del) 45 " Meghmani Organics Ltd. vs. DCIT 129 TTJ 255 (Ahd) " Anil Kumar Bhatiya vs. ACIT (2010) 1 ITR (Trib) 484 (Delhi) " Anil Mahavir Gupta vs. ACIT 182 TTTJ (Mum) 265 " Smrutisudha Nayak vs. UOI (2021) 5 NYPCTR 951 (Ori) " PCIT vs. Bhadani Financiers P Ltd (2021) 5 NYPCTR

MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 142/JODH/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur12 Oct 2023AY 2016-17
Section 143(3)Section 145Section 153A

124 TTJ (Jd) 674 " CIT vs. Kabul Chawla (2015) 281 CTR (Del) 45 " Meghmani Organics Ltd. vs. DCIT 129 TTJ 255 (Ahd) " Anil Kumar Bhatiya vs. ACIT (2010) 1 ITR (Trib) 484 (Delhi) " Anil Mahavir Gupta vs. ACIT 182 TTTJ (Mum) 265 " Smrutisudha Nayak vs. UOI (2021) 5 NYPCTR 951 (Ori) " PCIT vs. Bhadani Financiers P Ltd (2021) 5 NYPCTR

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR vs. M/S MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD., UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 167/JODH/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur12 Oct 2023AY 2016-17
Section 143(3)Section 145Section 153A

124 TTJ (Jd) 674 " CIT vs. Kabul Chawla (2015) 281 CTR (Del) 45 " Meghmani Organics Ltd. vs. DCIT 129 TTJ 255 (Ahd) " Anil Kumar Bhatiya vs. ACIT (2010) 1 ITR (Trib) 484 (Delhi) " Anil Mahavir Gupta vs. ACIT 182 TTTJ (Mum) 265 " Smrutisudha Nayak vs. UOI (2021) 5 NYPCTR 951 (Ori) " PCIT vs. Bhadani Financiers P Ltd (2021) 5 NYPCTR

MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 143/JODH/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur12 Oct 2023AY 2017-18
Section 143(3)Section 145Section 153A

124 TTJ (Jd) 674 " CIT vs. Kabul Chawla (2015) 281 CTR (Del) 45 " Meghmani Organics Ltd. vs. DCIT 129 TTJ 255 (Ahd) " Anil Kumar Bhatiya vs. ACIT (2010) 1 ITR (Trib) 484 (Delhi) " Anil Mahavir Gupta vs. ACIT 182 TTTJ (Mum) 265 " Smrutisudha Nayak vs. UOI (2021) 5 NYPCTR 951 (Ori) " PCIT vs. Bhadani Financiers P Ltd (2021) 5 NYPCTR

MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 140/JODH/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur12 Oct 2023AY 2014-15
Section 143(3)Section 145Section 153A

124 TTJ (Jd) 674 " CIT vs. Kabul Chawla (2015) 281 CTR (Del) 45 " Meghmani Organics Ltd. vs. DCIT 129 TTJ 255 (Ahd) " Anil Kumar Bhatiya vs. ACIT (2010) 1 ITR (Trib) 484 (Delhi) " Anil Mahavir Gupta vs. ACIT 182 TTTJ (Mum) 265 " Smrutisudha Nayak vs. UOI (2021) 5 NYPCTR 951 (Ori) " PCIT vs. Bhadani Financiers P Ltd (2021) 5 NYPCTR

MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 144/JODH/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur12 Oct 2023AY 2018-19
Section 143(3)Section 145Section 153A

124 TTJ (Jd) 674 " CIT vs. Kabul Chawla (2015) 281 CTR (Del) 45 " Meghmani Organics Ltd. vs. DCIT 129 TTJ 255 (Ahd) " Anil Kumar Bhatiya vs. ACIT (2010) 1 ITR (Trib) 484 (Delhi) " Anil Mahavir Gupta vs. ACIT 182 TTTJ (Mum) 265 " Smrutisudha Nayak vs. UOI (2021) 5 NYPCTR 951 (Ori) " PCIT vs. Bhadani Financiers P Ltd (2021) 5 NYPCTR

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR vs. M/S MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD., UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 168/JODH/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur12 Oct 2023AY 2017-18
Section 143(3)Section 145Section 153A

124 TTJ (Jd) 674 " CIT vs. Kabul Chawla (2015) 281 CTR (Del) 45 " Meghmani Organics Ltd. vs. DCIT 129 TTJ 255 (Ahd) " Anil Kumar Bhatiya vs. ACIT (2010) 1 ITR (Trib) 484 (Delhi) " Anil Mahavir Gupta vs. ACIT 182 TTTJ (Mum) 265 " Smrutisudha Nayak vs. UOI (2021) 5 NYPCTR 951 (Ori) " PCIT vs. Bhadani Financiers P Ltd (2021) 5 NYPCTR

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR vs. M/S MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD., UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 169/JODH/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur12 Oct 2023AY 2018-19
Section 143(3)Section 145Section 153A

124 TTJ (Jd) 674 " CIT vs. Kabul Chawla (2015) 281 CTR (Del) 45 " Meghmani Organics Ltd. vs. DCIT 129 TTJ 255 (Ahd) " Anil Kumar Bhatiya vs. ACIT (2010) 1 ITR (Trib) 484 (Delhi) " Anil Mahavir Gupta vs. ACIT 182 TTTJ (Mum) 265 " Smrutisudha Nayak vs. UOI (2021) 5 NYPCTR 951 (Ori) " PCIT vs. Bhadani Financiers P Ltd (2021) 5 NYPCTR

MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 141/JODH/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur12 Oct 2023AY 2015-16
Section 143(3)Section 145Section 153A

124 TTJ (Jd) 674 " CIT vs. Kabul Chawla (2015) 281 CTR (Del) 45 " Meghmani Organics Ltd. vs. DCIT 129 TTJ 255 (Ahd) " Anil Kumar Bhatiya vs. ACIT (2010) 1 ITR (Trib) 484 (Delhi) " Anil Mahavir Gupta vs. ACIT 182 TTTJ (Mum) 265 " Smrutisudha Nayak vs. UOI (2021) 5 NYPCTR 951 (Ori) " PCIT vs. Bhadani Financiers P Ltd (2021) 5 NYPCTR

SMT. PUSHPA CHHAJER,JODHPUR vs. ACIT,CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 136/JODH/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur02 Aug 2023AY 2014-15
Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 234B

section 143(3)/147 of the Income Tax Act, by the DCIT, Circle-01, Jodhpur. 2. The assessee has marched this appeal on the following grounds:- “1.That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Id CIT(A) grossly erred in upholding validity of order passed by the Id AO. 2. That on the facts

HITKARI AND SWARAJ ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED,BARMER vs. PR. CIT-1, JODHPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 61/JODH/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur24 Jan 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri B. R. Baskaran & Shri Sandeep Gosain

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 263

disallowance as per the provisions of Section 14A of the Act, the said assessment order will be an erroneous one and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue, as envisaged under the provisions of Section 263 of the Act. 70. In the case of CIT vs Amitabh Bachchan (2016) 384 ITR 200 (SC), the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held

ROYAL SUITINGS PRIVATE LIMITED ,BHILWARA vs. ITO, WARD-1, BHILWARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 261/JODH/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur09 Aug 2023AY 2010-11
Section 143(3)Section 154

section 154 dated 31.08.2018. The grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are as under:- “1. That assessee company made addition in plant & machinery of Rs. 21, 45,124/- and claimed depreciation thereon. 2. That A.O. disallowed the depreciation on these additions and completed the assessment by stating that these are not plant & machinery but fails to allow as revenue