BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 10A(7)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai568Bangalore513Delhi476Chennai217Kolkata125Pune93Ahmedabad89Hyderabad81Karnataka52Jaipur39Visakhapatnam28Cochin22Surat21Rajkot20Indore12Telangana11Lucknow11Chandigarh10Guwahati10Amritsar9Dehradun5Jodhpur4Raipur3SC2Panaji2Nagpur2Varanasi2Calcutta1Cuttack1Kerala1

Key Topics

Section 15416Section 10B12Section 118Section 1556Section 10A4Section 54F4Section 11(2)4Exemption4Deduction4Section 12A

M/S. KARNAWAT INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD.,JAIPUR vs. ITO, RAJSAMAND

In the result, the appeals of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 35/JODH/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur11 Aug 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

Section 10ASection 10BSection 154Section 155

disallowance of Rs. 13,47,897/- on the ground that the sale proceeds were not received in convertible foreign exchange within six months which was the statutory time allowed. However, subsequently, the assessee received the amounts in convertible foreign exchange in India on 09.06.2007, 14.11.2007 and 31.03.2008. Assessee filed evidences of the receipt of the sale consideration before the Assessing

M/S. KARNAWAT INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD.,JAIPUR vs. ITO, RAJSAMAND

In the result, the appeals of the assessee is dismissed

3
Disallowance3
Rectification u/s 1542
ITA 36/JODH/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur11 Aug 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

Section 10ASection 10BSection 154Section 155

disallowance of Rs. 13,47,897/- on the ground that the sale proceeds were not received in convertible foreign exchange within six months which was the statutory time allowed. However, subsequently, the assessee received the amounts in convertible foreign exchange in India on 09.06.2007, 14.11.2007 and 31.03.2008. Assessee filed evidences of the receipt of the sale consideration before the Assessing

UMED HOSPITAL MEDICARE RELIEF SOCIETY,JODHPUR vs. DCIT, CPC /ITO, EXEMPTION WARDM,, BANGALORE. JODHPUR

ITA 175/JODH/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur06 Oct 2023AY 2015-16
Section 11Section 11(2)Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 250Section 288

10A [section 10AA], clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 12A section 44AB [section 44DA, section 50B). section 80-1A, section 80-1B, section 80-IC. section 80- ID section 80JJAA, section 80LA, section 92E. [section 115JB or section 115VW] for to give a notice under Clause (a) of sub-section (2) of section

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BARMER vs. PUSHP RAJ BOHRA, JALORE

The appeal of the revenue is allowed, in the manner discussed as above

ITA 200/JODH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur01 Jul 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, HonʼBle & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon'Bleito, Ward-1, Barmer. Vs. Pushp Raj Bohra, M-09, Shivaji Nagar, Jalore - 343001. Pan No. Aanpb4456C Assessee By Shri Goutam Chand Baid, C.A. Revenue By Smt. Runi Pal, Cit (D.R.) Date Of Hearing 29.04.2025. Date Of Pronouncement 01.03.2025. Order Per Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, A.M.: The Captioned Appeal Has Been Filed By The Revenue Against The Order Of The Id. National Faceless Appeal Centre [Nfac/Cit(A)], Delhi Dated 08.02.2024 In Respect Of Assessment Year: 2017-18 Where The Department Has Raised Following Grounds: 1. Whether The Id. Cit(A) Is Justified In Facts & Law In Directing To Treat The Income From The Sale Of Immovable Properties As Capital Gains Instead Of Business Income, By Ignoring The Fact That Assesse & His Business Concerns Are Engaged In The Business Of Property & Real Estate Development & Huge Expenses Of Rs. 8.72 Cr. Were Incurred By Assessee On Development Of Projects To Earn Profit. 2. Whether The Id. Cit(A) Has Erred In Law & Facts By Directing The Ao To Treat The Income From The Sale Of Immovable Properties As Income From Capital Gains Instead Of Business Income By Merely Following The Order Of Hon'Ble

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 54ESection 54F

disallowance made by the AO, therefore, the AO is directed to allow full expenditure so incurred by the assessee amounting to Rs.43,90,029/-. We direct accordingly." 8.2In view of the fact that the issue in question has already been decided by ITAT in the case of appellant's own case in AY 2015-16, the same being binding