Search: depreciation

2 results for “depreciation”+ Section 254(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 698 Section 115B6 Section 69A4 Section 143(3)2 Section 1392 Business Income2 Unexplained Investment2 Unexplained Money2 Addition to Income2

SATYA NARAYAN CHOUDHARY ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in part

ITA 266/JODH/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur19 Mar 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R.C. Sharma & Shri Sandeep Gosainsatya Narayan Choudhary, Vs A.C.I.T., 58, Gokulpura, North Ayad, Central Circle-1, Udaipur-313001. Udaipur. (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aappc 9260 P Satya Narayan Choudhary, Vs A.C.I.T., 58, Gokulpura, North Ayad, Central Circle-1, Udaipur-313001. Udaipur.

Section 115BSection 139Section 143(3)Section 69Section 69A

254 (Bom.) (iv) Jagjit Pal Singh Anand vs. CIT 320 ITR 106 (Del.). Recently, the ITAT, Delhi in the case of Rajendra Kumar vs. DCIT in ITA No.1959/Del/2017 dated 27.02.2020 held that no addition is warranted 6 ITA 266 & 392/Jodh/2019 Satya Nr. Choudhary Vs ACIT against unexplained investment under the provisions of section 69 of the Act, IT 1961 where

SATYA NARAYAN CHOUDHARY ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR

SATYA NARAYAN CHOUDHARY ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR

SATYA NARAYAN CHOUDHARY ,UDAIPUR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR