BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “depreciation”+ Section 234B(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi729Mumbai602Bangalore385Ahmedabad141Kolkata73Chennai66Jaipur44Pune38Chandigarh30Hyderabad26Indore23Ranchi18Lucknow15Visakhapatnam11Surat11Dehradun9Amritsar9Agra7Cochin7Nagpur6Karnataka6SC4Cuttack4Rajkot3Allahabad2Patna2Jodhpur2Telangana2Punjab & Haryana1Calcutta1Panaji1Raipur1

Key Topics

Section 143(1)6Section 32(1)(i)2Section 234A2Section 145(3)2Depreciation2Addition to Income2

M/S. BABU LAL & COMPANY,BIKANER vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, BIKANER

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 205/JODH/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur03 May 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini, Hon’Ble Vice- & Shri N.K. Choudhry, Hon’Ble Judicial Mebmer M/S. Babu Lal & Company, Vs Acit, Circle-1, C/O. Sh. Rajendra Jain, Advocate, Bikaner. 106, Akshay Deep Complex, 5Th B Road, Sardarprua, Jodhpur. Pan No. Aagfb3045A

For Appellant: Shri Rajendra Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. P.K. Singi, JCIT-DR
Section 145(3)Section 234A

section 145(3). 2. That on the facts and in the circumstance of the case, the ld. CIT(A) grossly erred in sustaining the addition of Rs. 5,00,000/- to trading account on estimation basis. 3. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ld. CIT(A) grossly erred in not considering the explanation

SIPANI WOOLEN PRIVATE LIMITED,BIKANER vs. ITO, WARD-1(2), BIKANER

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 178/JODH/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur03 Aug 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Filing Of Income Tax Return & Disallowance On Account Of Incorrect

Section 143(1)Section 234ASection 32(1)(i)Section 36(1)(va)

section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, by the DCIT, CPC. 2 Sipani woolen Pvt Ltd. 2. The assessee has marched this appeal on the following grounds:- “1. The ld. CIT(A), Bikaner was wrong in law as well as in facts in upholding an addition of Rs. 2,26,484/- on account of employer and employee contribution