BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “depreciation”+ Section 234Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi328Mumbai199Bangalore113Jaipur47Chennai28Ahmedabad27Kolkata14Ranchi13Lucknow13Hyderabad10Indore8Pune7Dehradun7Guwahati6Nagpur4Surat3Rajkot3SC3Agra2Jodhpur2Patna2Punjab & Haryana1Panaji1Cochin1Chandigarh1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 143(1)6Section 32(1)(i)2Section 402Disallowance2Addition to Income2

ACIT, PAOTA C ROAD vs. VARAHA INFRA LIMITED, PAOTA B ROAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 160/JODH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur01 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Rathod Kamlesh Jayantbhaithe Acit Vs M/S. Vardha Infra Ltd. Room No. 215, Aayakar Bhawan 6 Jalam Vilas Scheme Paota C Road, Jodhpur Paota B Road, Jodhpur (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaccv 7972 K

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40

234A, 2348, 234C and 234D." 26 Varaha Infra Ltd. 8.1 The charge of interest under the above sections is mandatory but consequential to Income. The A O is directed to allow consequential relief to the assessee while giving effect to this appeal order. 9 The fifth ground of appeal is as under "The Ld. AO has erred in initiating penalty

SIPANI WOOLEN PRIVATE LIMITED,BIKANER vs. ITO, WARD-1(2), BIKANER

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 178/JODH/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur03 Aug 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Filing Of Income Tax Return & Disallowance On Account Of Incorrect

Section 143(1)Section 234ASection 32(1)(i)Section 36(1)(va)

section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, by the DCIT, CPC. 2 Sipani woolen Pvt Ltd. 2. The assessee has marched this appeal on the following grounds:- “1. The ld. CIT(A), Bikaner was wrong in law as well as in facts in upholding an addition of Rs. 2,26,484/- on account of employer and employee contribution