BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

14 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 90(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai628Mumbai535Delhi386Kolkata339Hyderabad219Bangalore218Ahmedabad200Jaipur133Karnataka128Pune85Surat82Raipur77Chandigarh69Indore63Visakhapatnam62Nagpur59Amritsar55Lucknow50Cochin48Calcutta41Rajkot32Cuttack24Patna22SC19Jodhpur14Allahabad14Varanasi11Agra9Jabalpur8Guwahati7Telangana5Panaji4Dehradun4Ranchi3Andhra Pradesh2Rajasthan2Orissa1Himachal Pradesh1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1

Key Topics

Limitation/Time-bar11Condonation of Delay10Section 1449Natural Justice9Section 868Section 234E6Section 139(1)6Section 2005Addition to Income

SUSHIL KUMAR MARLECHA,PALI vs. DEPUTY/ASSTT, CIT (CPC-TDS) / ITO, TDS-1,, GHAZIABAD / JODHPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 123/JODH/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur04 Oct 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Its Hearing Before Your Honour.”

Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 201Section 205CSection 206CSection 234E

condoned. 1.8. It will also be worthwhile to submit that the Board was also considering the difficulties being faced genuinely by the taxpayers in making such compliance and that the penal provisions under section 234E may be too harsh to be implemented. The penalty of Rs. 200/- for such technical defect was too high, and therefore a Circular was issued

5
Disallowance4
Section 200A3
Section 143(3)2

MUNNA RAM,JODHPUR vs. ITO, WARD-3(5), JODHPUR

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 24/JODH/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur28 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: DR. MITHA LAL MEENA, HON’BLE (Accountant Member), SHRI SUDHIR PAREEK, HON’BLE (Judicial Member)

Section 144Section 249Section 249(2)Section 249(3)

2) of the Act envisages that there should be sufficient cause for not prosecuting the appeal within the period prescribed. The Ld. CIT (A) stated that it is well-settled law that a distinction must be made between a case where the delay is inordinate and where the delay is of few days only and that the inordinate delay

ADARSH CREDIT COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,AHMEDABAD. vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result, these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 5/JODH/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur17 Mar 2025AY 2012-13
Section 144Section 86

90 days from\n01.03.2022, the effective net delay in filing the appeal 280 days only. The\ncounsel contended that the Assessment order was passed under section 144 of\nthe Income Tax Act, 1961, invoking provisions of best judgement, an ex-parte\norder qua the assessee society where the Assessment order indicated the\naddress as ADARSH PRINTER BHAWAN RAJMATA DHARAMSALA, SIROHI

ADARSH CREDIT COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. ,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result, these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 10/JODH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur17 Mar 2025AY 2017-18
Section 144Section 86

90 days from\n01.03.2022, the effective net delay in filing the appeal 280 days only. The\ncounsel contended that the Assessment order was passed under section 144 of\nthe Income Tax Act, 1961, invoking provisions of best judgement, an ex-parte\norder qua the assessee society where the Assessment order indicated the\naddress as ADARSH PRINTER BHAWAN RAJMATA DHARAMSALA, SIROHI

M/S. SUNIL & COMPANY,JODHPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 502/JODH/2018[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur03 Aug 2023AY 2004-05

Bench: Its Hearing Before Your Honour.”

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(iii)

section 143(3)/254 of the Income Tax Act, by ACIT, Circle-01, Jodhpur[ here in after reffered to as “ld. AO”]. 2. The assessee has marched this appeal on the following grounds:- “1. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(A) erred in sustaining the disallowance of interest

ADARSH CREDIT COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. ,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result, these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 11/JODH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur17 Mar 2025AY 2018-19
Section 144Section 86

90 days from\n01.03.2022, the effective net delay in filing the appeal 280 days only. The\ncounsel contended that the Assessment order was passed under section 144 of\nthe Income Tax Act, 1961, invoking provisions of best judgement, an ex-parte\norder qua the assessee society where the Assessment order indicated the\naddress as ADARSH PRINTER BHAWAN RAJMATA DHARAMSALA, SIROHI

ADARSH CREDIT COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result, these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical

ITA 6/JODH/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur17 Mar 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon'Ble & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon'Ble

Section 144Section 86

condone the delay in filing appeal before CIT Appeal and remand the matter to adjudicate on merits. In support to substantiate the cause of delay, he filed an affidavit of the official liquidator certified by Registered Notary which reads as under: 4 ITA No. 5 to 12/Jodh/2024 Assessment Year 2012-13 to 2019-20 Certificate No. Certificate Issued Date Account

ADARSH CREDIT COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result, these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical

ITA 8/JODH/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur17 Mar 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon'Ble & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon'Ble

Section 144Section 86

condone the delay in filing appeal before CIT Appeal and remand the matter to adjudicate on merits. In support to substantiate the cause of delay, he filed an affidavit of the official liquidator certified by Registered Notary which reads as under: 4 ITA No. 5 to 12/Jodh/2024 Assessment Year

ADARSH CREDIT COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. ,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result, these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 9/JODH/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur17 Mar 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, HonʼBle & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon'Ble

Section 144Section 86

condone the delay in filing appeal before CIT Appeal and remand the matter to adjudicate on merits. In support to substantiate the cause of delay, he filed an affidavit of the official liquidator certified by Registered Notary which reads as under: BEFORE THE HON'BLE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (ITAT)-Jodhpur Bench In the matter of Adarsh Credit Co-Operative

ADARSH CREDIT COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result, these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 7/JODH/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur17 Mar 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, HonʼBle & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon'Ble

Section 144Section 86

condone the delay in filing appeal before CIT Appeal and remand the matter to adjudicate on merits. In support to substantiate the cause of delay, he filed an affidavit of the official liquidator certified by Registered Notary which reads as under: INDIA NON JUDICIAL IN-GJ59714587427278W Government of Gujarat सत्यमेव जयते Certificate of Stamp Duty RG. SERIAL NO. 9.86 DATE

ADARSH CREDIT COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result, these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 12/JODH/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur17 Mar 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, HonʼBle & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon'Ble

Section 144Section 86

condone the delay in filing appeal before CIT Appeal and remand the matter to adjudicate on merits. In support to substantiate the cause of delay, he filed an affidavit of the official liquidator certified by Registered Notary. *(Content of the Stamp Paper/Affidavit from Page 4 is supporting evidence; its main points are detailed below)* A Stamp Certificate (Affidavit) from

BHOOP SINGH POONIA,NOHAR vs. ITO WARD, NOHAR, NOHAR

ITA 405/JODH/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur17 Jun 2025AY 2014-15
Section 133A

condone the delay and proceed to\ndecide the appeal on merit.\n4. The assessee has taken six grounds of appeal. In\nGround No.1, grievance of the assessee is that ld. CIT(A) has\nerred in confirming the addition of Rs.25 lacs made by the\nAO on account of disallowance of excess stock claimed by the\nassessee.\n5. The brief facts

M/S. PROGRESSIVE AND POPULAR MINERALS PRIVATE LIMITED,CHITTORGARH vs. ACIT, CIRCLE, CHITTORGARH

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 95/JODH/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur08 Nov 2021AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri N. K. Saini & Shri N. K. Choudhryआयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.95 & 96/Jodh/2021 (यनिाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2018-2019 & 2019-2020)

For Appellant: Shri Shyam Singhvi, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.M.Joshi, JCIT-DR
Section 139(1)Section 250Section 36(1)(va)Section 43

90 days from 3rd October, 2021. Hence, we are of the considered opinion that the delay, if any, in these appeals, deserves to be condoned as per the direction given by the Hon’ble Apex Court. admitted. 7. Coming to the merits of the case, we may observe that the issue involved in the present appeal is squarely covered

M/S. PROGRESSIVE AND POPULAR MINERALS PRIVATE LIMITED,CHITTORGARH vs. ACIT, CIRCLE, CHITTORGARH

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 96/JODH/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur08 Nov 2021AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri N. K. Saini & Shri N. K. Choudhryआयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.95 & 96/Jodh/2021 (यनिाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2018-2019 & 2019-2020)

For Appellant: Shri Shyam Singhvi, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.M.Joshi, JCIT-DR
Section 139(1)Section 250Section 36(1)(va)Section 43

90 days from 3rd October, 2021. Hence, we are of the considered opinion that the delay, if any, in these appeals, deserves to be condoned as per the direction given by the Hon’ble Apex Court. admitted. 7. Coming to the merits of the case, we may observe that the issue involved in the present appeal is squarely covered