BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 73clear

Sorted by relevance

Patna483Chennai451Mumbai386Pune307Bangalore298Delhi255Kolkata212Ahmedabad149Hyderabad135Karnataka131Chandigarh123Jaipur107Visakhapatnam82Surat48Amritsar48Cochin47Calcutta46Indore45Cuttack41Lucknow30Nagpur29Rajkot22Dehradun20Guwahati14Raipur14Agra14SC13Panaji12Telangana11Jodhpur9Allahabad8Varanasi6Ranchi4Jabalpur4Orissa3Rajasthan3Andhra Pradesh2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Section 234E54Section 200A24Section 15412Section 139(1)9Section 1397Section 143(1)7Section 201(2)6Section 201(1)6TDS

MUNICIPAL BOARD,PHALODI vs. JCIT,TDS, JODHPUR

In the result, appeal in ITA No

ITA 111/JODH/2019[2017-18 (26Q - 3)]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur25 Nov 2019

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri Sandeep Gosain

For Appellant: Shri Bhawani Singh Bhati, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Girish Mehta, JCIT DR
Section 139Section 139(9)Section 154Section 200ASection 201(1)Section 201(2)Section 234E

delayed filling of statement of tax deducted. 7. The late fee can't be the way of revenue when interest (if Payable) was separately charged from the assessee, since imposing the late fee is constitutionally invalid as it is double charged hence it should be waived. 8. The appellant craves liberty to add amend alter and modify

6
Disallowance3
Addition to Income2
Limitation/Time-bar2

MUNICIPAL BOARD,PHALODI vs. JCIT,TDS, JODHPUR

In the result, appeal in ITA No

ITA 112/JODH/2019[2017-18 (26 Q - 4)]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur25 Nov 2019

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri Sandeep Gosain

For Appellant: Shri Bhawani Singh Bhati, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Girish Mehta, JCIT DR
Section 139Section 139(9)Section 154Section 200ASection 201(1)Section 201(2)Section 234E

delayed filling of statement of tax deducted. 7. The late fee can't be the way of revenue when interest (if Payable) was separately charged from the assessee, since imposing the late fee is constitutionally invalid as it is double charged hence it should be waived. 8. The appellant craves liberty to add amend alter and modify

MUNICIPAL BOARD,PHALODI vs. JCIT-TDS, JODHPUR

In the result, appeal in ITA No

ITA 106/JODH/2019[2016-17 (26Q-1)]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur25 Nov 2019

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri Sandeep Gosain

For Appellant: Shri Bhawani Singh Bhati, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Girish Mehta, JCIT DR
Section 139Section 139(9)Section 154Section 200ASection 201(1)Section 201(2)Section 234E

delayed filling of statement of tax deducted. 7. The late fee can't be the way of revenue when interest (if Payable) was separately charged from the assessee, since imposing the late fee is constitutionally invalid as it is double charged hence it should be waived. 8. The appellant craves liberty to add amend alter and modify

MUNICIPAL BOARD,PHALODI vs. JCIT,TDS, JODHPUR

In the result, appeal in ITA No

ITA 107/JODH/2019[2016-17 (26 Q-2)]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur25 Nov 2019

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri Sandeep Gosain

For Appellant: Shri Bhawani Singh Bhati, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Girish Mehta, JCIT DR
Section 139Section 139(9)Section 154Section 200ASection 201(1)Section 201(2)Section 234E

delayed filling of statement of tax deducted. 7. The late fee can't be the way of revenue when interest (if Payable) was separately charged from the assessee, since imposing the late fee is constitutionally invalid as it is double charged hence it should be waived. 8. The appellant craves liberty to add amend alter and modify

MUNICIPAL BOARD,PHALODI vs. JCIT,TDS, JODHPUR

In the result, appeal in ITA No

ITA 109/JODH/2019[2017-18 (26 Q- 1)]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur25 Nov 2019

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri Sandeep Gosain

For Appellant: Shri Bhawani Singh Bhati, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Girish Mehta, JCIT DR
Section 139Section 139(9)Section 154Section 200ASection 201(1)Section 201(2)Section 234E

delayed filling of statement of tax deducted. 7. The late fee can't be the way of revenue when interest (if Payable) was separately charged from the assessee, since imposing the late fee is constitutionally invalid as it is double charged hence it should be waived. 8. The appellant craves liberty to add amend alter and modify

MUNICIPAL BOARD,PHALODI vs. JCIT,TDS, JODHPUR

In the result, appeal in ITA No

ITA 110/JODH/2019[2017-18 (26 Q-2)]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur25 Nov 2019

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri Sandeep Gosain

For Appellant: Shri Bhawani Singh Bhati, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Girish Mehta, JCIT DR
Section 139Section 139(9)Section 154Section 200ASection 201(1)Section 201(2)Section 234E

delayed filling of statement of tax deducted. 7. The late fee can't be the way of revenue when interest (if Payable) was separately charged from the assessee, since imposing the late fee is constitutionally invalid as it is double charged hence it should be waived. 8. The appellant craves liberty to add amend alter and modify

DHABAN GRAM SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITY,SANGARIA vs. ITO WARD 1 , HANUMANGARH

In the result, appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 771/JODH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur21 Aug 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon’Ble & Shri Anikesh Banerjee, Hon’Ble

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 250Section 80ASection 80PSection 80P(2)(iv)

condone the delay, and the matter is admitted for adjudication. 3. We heard the rival submissions and considered the documents available on the record. The assessee is a co-operative society engaged in business of trading in fertilizers and pesticides to its members. The assessee, while filing return of income claimed exemption under section 80P(2)(iv) amount to Rs.3

M/S. PROGRESSIVE AND POPULAR MINERALS PRIVATE LIMITED,CHITTORGARH vs. ACIT, CIRCLE, CHITTORGARH

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 96/JODH/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur08 Nov 2021AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri N. K. Saini & Shri N. K. Choudhryआयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.95 & 96/Jodh/2021 (यनिाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2018-2019 & 2019-2020)

For Appellant: Shri Shyam Singhvi, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.M.Joshi, JCIT-DR
Section 139(1)Section 250Section 36(1)(va)Section 43

73 days in filing both the appeals. In this regard, the assessee circumstances, both the appeals could not file within the time. Ld. AR of the assessee also drew our attention to the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Collector Land acquisition Vs. Mst. Katiji [167 ITR 467 (SC)] and submitted that the delay

M/S. PROGRESSIVE AND POPULAR MINERALS PRIVATE LIMITED,CHITTORGARH vs. ACIT, CIRCLE, CHITTORGARH

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 95/JODH/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur08 Nov 2021AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri N. K. Saini & Shri N. K. Choudhryआयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.95 & 96/Jodh/2021 (यनिाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2018-2019 & 2019-2020)

For Appellant: Shri Shyam Singhvi, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.M.Joshi, JCIT-DR
Section 139(1)Section 250Section 36(1)(va)Section 43

73 days in filing both the appeals. In this regard, the assessee circumstances, both the appeals could not file within the time. Ld. AR of the assessee also drew our attention to the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Collector Land acquisition Vs. Mst. Katiji [167 ITR 467 (SC)] and submitted that the delay