UMRAV SINGH,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD 1, SRI GANGANAGAR
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 783/JODH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur30 Oct 2025AY 2018-19
Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)
For Appellant: Ms. Radhika Gupta, CA (Adjournment Application)For Respondent: Shri Arvind Kumar Gehlot, Addl. CIT-DR
Section 144Section 147Section 234ASection 249(3)Section 69A
69A of the Act. The total assessed income was determined at Rs.72,52,000/-, and consequential demand was raised against the assessee
5. Aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal before the CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi. The appeal, however, was instituted belatedly with a delay of 284 days. The assessee pleaded that the delay occurred due to his severe medical condition
