BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 44clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai544Chennai537Delhi502Kolkata278Bangalore217Jaipur155Karnataka148Ahmedabad143Hyderabad141Chandigarh114Pune102Indore74Nagpur74Surat59Visakhapatnam57Raipur52Lucknow45Amritsar44Cuttack40Calcutta39Rajkot37Patna26SC22Dehradun14Telangana13Cochin11Guwahati10Varanasi10Jodhpur8Allahabad8Rajasthan5Orissa5Agra4Jabalpur4Panaji3Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 14714Section 1549Section 2506Addition to Income6Natural Justice6Condonation of Delay6Section 143(3)5Section 1484Section 153A

M/S. SUNIL & COMPANY,JODHPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 502/JODH/2018[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur03 Aug 2023AY 2004-05

Bench: Its Hearing Before Your Honour.”

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(iii)

section 143(3)/254 of the Income Tax Act, by ACIT, Circle-01, Jodhpur[ here in after reffered to as “ld. AO”]. 2. The assessee has marched this appeal on the following grounds:- “1. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(A) erred in sustaining the disallowance of interest

JANAK SINGH BHATI,JAISALMER vs. LD. ASSESSING OFFICER, FACELESSS ASSESSMENT UNIT

In the result, both the captioned appeals of the assesses are allowed for

ITA 856/JODH/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed
4
Section 250(6)2
Section 2022
Rectification u/s 1542
ITAT Jodhpur
25 Nov 2025
AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon'Ble & Dr. S. Seethalakshmi, Hon'Ble

Section 144BSection 147

44, Adhivakta Colony, Jaisalmer - 345001. PAN NO. AKRPS5464K Assessee by Revenue by Date of Hearing Date of Pronouncement ITO, Barmer Ms. Divya Phophalia, CA Dr. Ashwini Hosmani, Addl. CIT-DR 10.11.2025. 25.11 .2025. DR. MITHA LAL MEENA, A.M.: ORDER The Captioned appeals are filed by the assessee against the separate orders passed by the Ld. National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC

JANAK SINGH BHATI,JAISALMER vs. LD. ASSESSING OFFICER, FACELESS ASSESSMENT UNIT

In the result, both the captioned appeals of the assesses are allowed for

ITA 857/JODH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur25 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon'Ble & Dr. S. Seethalakshmi, Hon'Ble

Section 144BSection 147

44, Adhivakta Colony, Jaisalmer - 345001. PAN NO. AKRPS5464K Assessee by Revenue by Date of Hearing Date of Pronouncement ITO, Barmer Ms. Divya Phophalia, CA Dr. Ashwini Hosmani, Addl. CIT-DR 10.11.2025. 25.11 .2025. ORDER DR. MITHA LAL MEENA, Α.Μ.: The Captioned appeals are filed by the assessee against the separate orders passed by the Ld. National Faceless Appeal Centre

KAILASH CHANDRA MOONDRA ,SUMERPUR vs. ITO,, SUMERPUR

In the result, ITA No. 334/Jodh/2019 is allowed for statistical purpose and

ITA 339/JODH/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur10 Nov 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 147Section 148Section 154Section 202Section 250Section 250(6)

delay for 240 days of the assessee is duly condoned. 3. In the outset, one appeal of the assessee is filed against the appeal order passed u/s 250 (6) of the Act and another appeal against the order which was passed u/s 154 related to rectification of the main appeal order for the impugned assessment year. The issue of both

KAILASH CHANDRA MOONDRA ,SUMERPUR vs. ITO,, SUMERPUR

In the result, ITA No. 334/Jodh/2019 is allowed for statistical purpose and

ITA 334/JODH/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur10 Nov 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 147Section 148Section 154Section 202Section 250Section 250(6)

delay for 240 days of the assessee is duly condoned. 3. In the outset, one appeal of the assessee is filed against the appeal order passed u/s 250 (6) of the Act and another appeal against the order which was passed u/s 154 related to rectification of the main appeal order for the impugned assessment year. The issue of both

M/S. M.M. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ,CHURU. vs. ITO, WARD-2,, CHURU.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 386/JODH/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur20 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Rajendra Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Mohan, JCIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 145Section 154

condone the said delay and take up the matter for adjudication. 4. Brief facts of the case are that assessee filed its return of income on 30.09.2012, reporting total income of Rs. 46,010/- . Assessee is engaged in the business of civil contract and realized total gross receipt of Rs. 3,05,96,037/- on which it declared

BHARAT CHATURBHUJ VEDANT,MUMBAI vs. DC, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JODHPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee bearing ITA Nos

ITA 431/JODH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur04 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: BEFOREDR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member), SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Ajay R Singh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ajey Malik, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 153ASection 250

condone the delay of 15 days and admit the appeals of the assessee for adjudication. 3. All the appeals have identical facts and circumstances and common issues. Therefore, we heard all the appeals together and are disposed of by this common order. 4. The Ld.AR in argument placed that the addition was made of Rs.1,44

BHARAT CHATURBHUJ VEDANT,MUMBAI vs. DC, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JODHPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee bearing ITA Nos

ITA 430/JODH/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur04 Jun 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: BEFOREDR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member), SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Ajay R Singh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ajey Malik, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 153ASection 250

condone the delay of 15 days and admit the appeals of the assessee for adjudication. 3. All the appeals have identical facts and circumstances and common issues. Therefore, we heard all the appeals together and are disposed of by this common order. 4. The Ld.AR in argument placed that the addition was made of Rs.1,44