JAGDISH BENIWAL,GANDHIDHAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BARMER, BARMER
In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 867/JODH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur18 Aug 2025AY 2017-18
Bench: The Tribunal. The Assessee Has Moved A Condonation Petition Explaining That The Delay Occurred Due To The Assessee Being Unaware Of The Status Of The Appeal Before The Cit(A) & The Lapse On The Part Of His Erstwhile Authorised Representative, Who Failed To Communicate The Outcome Or Advise Timely Further Action. It Was Submitted That The Assessee Had Re-Engaged Counsel Only After Becoming Aware Of The Adverse Order & Immediate Steps Were Taken Thereafter To Prefer The Present Appeal.
For Appellant: Shri Chetan Aggarwal, C.AFor Respondent: Smt. Anuradha, Addl. CIT DR
Section 144
41, Office No. 30
Ward-1
Ground Floor, Sector 9,
Barmer
Gandhidham-370201
PAN NO: BCFPB8233C
Appellant
Respondent
Assessee by :
Shri Chetan Aggarwal, C.A Revenue by :
Smt. Anuradha, Addl. CIT DR
Date of Hearing :
31/07/2025
Date of Pronouncement :
18/08/2025
आदेश/Order
PER LALIET KUMAR, J.M:
This appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated
05.02.2024 passed
