BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 279(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai186Karnataka103Mumbai78Chandigarh58Kolkata29Delhi28Bangalore19Jaipur19Cochin13Cuttack10Ahmedabad7Hyderabad7Patna7Nagpur7Surat6Pune6Lucknow4SC3Visakhapatnam2Indore2Jodhpur2Panaji1Guwahati1Raipur1Rajasthan1Rajkot1Andhra Pradesh1Amritsar1Telangana1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 1546Section 143(1)(a)4Section 114Section 139(9)2Section 143(1)2Exemption2Disallowance2Condonation of Delay2Rectification u/s 154

DUSHKAL GO SEWA SAMITI,SUMERPUR vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), JODHPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 5/JODH/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur06 Oct 2023AY 2018-19
Section 11Section 139(9)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 154

1)(b) as these requirements are only directory in nature. We are of the view that the approach in the cases of the present type should be equitious, balancing and judicious. Technically, strictly and liberally speaking, the respondent might be justified in denying the exemption under section 12 of the Act 15 TRUST FOR REACHING by rejecting such condonation application

DUSHKAL GO SEWA SAMITI,SUMERPUR vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), JODHPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

2
ITA 9/JODH/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur06 Oct 2023AY 2017-18
Section 11Section 139(9)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 154

1)(b) as these requirements are only directory in nature. We are of the view that the approach in the cases of the present type should be equitious, balancing and judicious. Technically, strictly and liberally speaking, the respondent might be justified in denying the exemption under section 12 of the Act 15 TRUST FOR REACHING by rejecting such condonation application