Search: condonation of delay | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 234Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai147 Bangalore132 Ahmedabad89 Delhi84 Hyderabad73 Jaipur60 Chandigarh44 Pune40 Chennai32 Kolkata24 Karnataka21 Nagpur20 Indore17 Rajkot17 Patna13 Lucknow10 Cochin9 Raipur9 Surat8 Visakhapatnam6 Guwahati6 Jodhpur5 Allahabad4 Agra3 Jabalpur3 Panaji1 Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 118 Section 1477 Section 69A6 Section 1484 Section 11(2)4 Capital Gains4 Addition to Income4 Section 234A3 Section 1443

UMRAV SINGH,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD 1, SRI GANGANAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 782/JODH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur30 Oct 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Ms. Radhika Gupta, CA (Adjournment Application)For Respondent: Shri Arvind Kumar Gehlot, Addl. CIT-DR

Section 144Section 147Section 234ASection 249(3)Section 69A

section 234A and 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 5. That, the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi, erred in not condoning the delay

Section 249(3)3

Unexplained Money3

UMRAV SINGH,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD 1, SRI GANGANAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 783/JODH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur30 Oct 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Ms. Radhika Gupta, CA (Adjournment Application)For Respondent: Shri Arvind Kumar Gehlot, Addl. CIT-DR

Section 144Section 147Section 234ASection 249(3)Section 69A

section 234A and 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 5. That, the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi, erred in not condoning the delay

UMRAV SINGH,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD 1, SRI GANGANAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 781/JODH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur30 Oct 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Ms. Radhika Gupta, CA (Adjournment Application)For Respondent: Shri Arvind Kumar Gehlot, Addl. CIT-DR

Section 144Section 147Section 234ASection 249(3)Section 69A

section 234A and 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 5. That, the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi, erred in not condoning the delay

UMED HOSPITAL MEDICARE RELIEF SOCIETY,JODHPUR vs. DCIT, CPC /ITO, EXEMPTION WARDM,, BANGALORE. JODHPUR

ITA 175/JODH/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur06 Oct 2023AY 2015-16

Section 11Section 11(2)Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 250Section 288

234A, 234B and 234C of the IT Act, 1961. 5. That the appellant craves leave to add, amend, alter vary and/or withdraw any or all the above grounds of Appeal at or before the time of hearing. 6.That the appellant prays for justice and relief.” 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a charitable trust

MAHENDRA RATHI,BIKANER vs. ITO, BIKANER

ITA 299/JODH/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur28 May 2025AY 2010-11

Section 147Section 148Section 2(14)(iii)Section 234Section 250

condoned and\nappeal admitted.\n3. Having heard both the sides and perusal of material on record, we find\nthat the Ld. NFAC has rejected the appeal ex parte qua the assessee summarily\nby a non-speaking appeal order without mentioning the factum of service of\nnotices of hearing issued u/s 250 of the Act, up on the appellant