Search: condonation of delay

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 234Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 1479 Section 118 Section 69A6 Addition to Income5 Section 1444 Section 11(2)4 Section 234A3 Section 249(3)3 Section 12A3 Capital Gains3 Unexplained Money3

UMRAV SINGH,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD 1, SRI GANGANAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 783/JODH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur30 Oct 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Ms. Radhika Gupta, CA (Adjournment Application)For Respondent: Shri Arvind Kumar Gehlot, Addl. CIT-DR

Section 144Section 147Section 234ASection 249(3)Section 69A

section 234A and 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 5. That, the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi, erred in not condoning the delay

UMRAV SINGH,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD 1, SRI GANGANAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 782/JODH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur30 Oct 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Ms. Radhika Gupta, CA (Adjournment Application)For Respondent: Shri Arvind Kumar Gehlot, Addl. CIT-DR

Section 144Section 147Section 234ASection 249(3)Section 69A

section 234A and 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 5. That, the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi, erred in not condoning the delay

UMRAV SINGH,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD 1, SRI GANGANAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 781/JODH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur30 Oct 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Ms. Radhika Gupta, CA (Adjournment Application)For Respondent: Shri Arvind Kumar Gehlot, Addl. CIT-DR

Section 144Section 147Section 234ASection 249(3)Section 69A

section 234A and 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 5. That, the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi, erred in not condoning the delay

UMED HOSPITAL MEDICARE RELIEF SOCIETY,JODHPUR vs. DCIT, CPC /ITO, EXEMPTION WARDM,, BANGALORE. JODHPUR

ITA 175/JODH/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur06 Oct 2023AY 2015-16

Section 11Section 11(2)Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 250Section 288

234A, 234B and 234C of the IT Act, 1961. 5. That the appellant craves leave to add, amend, alter vary and/or withdraw any or all the above grounds of Appeal at or before the time of hearing. 6.That the appellant prays for justice and relief.” 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a charitable trust

NARAYAN LAL PURBIYA,BHILWARA vs. ITO, WARD-4, BHILWARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 412/JODH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur27 Sept 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: The Hon'Ble Itat. May It Please Your Honours. The Appellant Is Resident Of A Small Village In Bhilwara District.The Appellant Was Not Assessed To Tax Prior To The Assessment Year Under Consideration As His Income Was Below Taxable Limit. During The Previous Year Relevant To The Assessment Year 2011-12, The Appellant Made Total Cash Deposits Of Rs. 10,13,900/- In His Bank Account, On The Basis Of Which The Ld. Ito, Ward-4,Bhilwara Initiated Proceedings U/S. 147/148. For Filing The Return Of Income & Persuing The Case Before The Ao The Appellant Had Engaged Sh. Ankit Lakhotiya. As His

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. Monisha, JCIT DR

Section 144Section 147

condone the delay by taking a liberal view and considering the principles of natural justice and the appeal is admitted. 6. In the present case, following grounds have been raised:- 1. The ld. CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in upholding the validity of initiation of proceedings u/s 147/148 of the I.T.Act