BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 2(37)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai905Delhi667Mumbai653Kolkata425Bangalore281Hyderabad239Ahmedabad197Pune166Jaipur163Karnataka144Chandigarh142Amritsar89Indore87Nagpur82Raipur80Surat78Cuttack52Lucknow48Calcutta44Rajkot39Panaji37Visakhapatnam26Patna24Cochin23SC22Telangana21Allahabad14Varanasi12Guwahati12Jabalpur10Dehradun9Orissa7Rajasthan5Jodhpur4Agra3Ranchi1Himachal Pradesh1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 1112Section 143(1)(a)6Section 143(1)6Section 1546Section 11(2)4Section 12A3Exemption3Disallowance3Section 139(9)

DUSHKAL GO SEWA SAMITI,SUMERPUR vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), JODHPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 5/JODH/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur06 Oct 2023AY 2018-19
Section 11Section 139(9)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 154

condoned the delay in filing the Form No.10B. Therefore, I am of the considered opinion that the AO has rightly held that there is no mistake apparent from record rectifiable u/s 154 at this stage. Accordingly, the grounds of appeal are dismissed. 5. In the result, the appeal is dismissed.” 6. As the assessee did not receive any favor from

DUSHKAL GO SEWA SAMITI,SUMERPUR vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), JODHPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

2
Section 139(4)2
Addition to Income2
Condonation of Delay2
ITA 9/JODH/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur06 Oct 2023AY 2017-18
Section 11Section 139(9)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 154

condoned the delay in filing the Form No.10B. Therefore, I am of the considered opinion that the AO has rightly held that there is no mistake apparent from record rectifiable u/s 154 at this stage. Accordingly, the grounds of appeal are dismissed. 5. In the result, the appeal is dismissed.” 6. As the assessee did not receive any favor from

UMED HOSPITAL MEDICARE RELIEF SOCIETY,JODHPUR vs. DCIT, CPC /ITO, EXEMPTION WARDM,, BANGALORE. JODHPUR

ITA 175/JODH/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur06 Oct 2023AY 2015-16
Section 11Section 11(2)Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 250Section 288

section 11 and 12 shall apply to the case of the assessee Accordingly no exemption is granted u/s 11(2) of the IT Act for the year under consideration In result the appeal of the appellant is dismissed.” 5. As the assessee did not receive any favour from the appeal filed before ld. NFAC/ CIT(A). The present appeal filed

M/S. KHADI GRAMMODHYOG PRATISTHAN,BIKANER vs. ADIT, CPC / ITO, WARD-1(2), BANGALURU / BIKANER

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 87/JODH/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur31 Aug 2023AY 2019-20
Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 250(6)

2. The assessing officer should have accepted the revised return submitted by the assessee which was in accordance with the law and CIT(A) should have accepted the ground and should not rejected without reading the ground. 3. That the order passed by the CIT(A) is not reasoned order and disallowance made by the assessing officer is confirm arbitrary