BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

13 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 13(2)(h)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi448Jaipur402Mumbai377Chennai369Bangalore187Hyderabad184Kolkata170Chandigarh135Karnataka134Pune133Raipur80Amritsar72Ahmedabad69Cuttack56Surat48Cochin42Calcutta36Lucknow28Rajkot28Indore24SC23Visakhapatnam22Nagpur14Jodhpur13Varanasi9Guwahati8Telangana8Agra6Patna6Allahabad6Kerala5Orissa2Dehradun2Panaji2Gauhati1Andhra Pradesh1R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1Himachal Pradesh1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Rajasthan1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Condonation of Delay11Natural Justice9Section 12A8Limitation/Time-bar8Section 867Section 1447Section 1546Section 271(1)(b)6Section 143(1)

DUSHKAL GO SEWA SAMITI,SUMERPUR vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), JODHPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 9/JODH/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur06 Oct 2023AY 2017-18
Section 11Section 139(9)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 154

H High Court) 13 Sarvodaya Charitable Trust Exemption u/s 11 cannot be denied merely only on Vs. ITO, Exemption (2021) the basis of delayed filing of Form 10B. 125 taxmann.com 75 ( Hon’ble Gujarat High Court) 14 Xavier Kelavani Mandal the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court has held that even (P.) Ltd. (2014) if the Form No. 10B is filed

DUSHKAL GO SEWA SAMITI,SUMERPUR vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), JODHPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

5
Section 143(2)4
Section 143(1)(a)4
Disallowance4
ITA 5/JODH/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur06 Oct 2023AY 2018-19
Section 11Section 139(9)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 154

H High Court) 13 Sarvodaya Charitable Trust Exemption u/s 11 cannot be denied merely only on Vs. ITO, Exemption (2021) the basis of delayed filing of Form 10B. 125 taxmann.com 75 ( Hon’ble Gujarat High Court) 14 Xavier Kelavani Mandal the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court has held that even (P.) Ltd. (2014) if the Form No. 10B is filed

VAMITA SINGH,JAIPUR vs. ITO, , BALOTRA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 87/JODH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur22 Feb 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 87/Jodh/2019 Fu/Kzkj.K O"Kz@Assessment Year :2011-12 Vamita Singh, Cuke Ito, Vs. C/O-Ashok Kumar Bansal, C.A., Ward-7(3) 2Nd Vijay Shanti Plaza, Near Jaipur. Railway Crossing, Balotra-344022. Lfkk;H Ys[Kk La-@Thvkbzvkj La-@Pan/Gir No.: Atzps 9372 B Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respondent Fu/Kzkfjrh Dh Vksj Ls@ Assessee By: Shri Ashok Kumar Bansal (Ca) Jktlo Dh Vksj Ls@ Revenue By : Smt. Monisha Choudhary(Addl.Cit) Lquokbz Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Hearing : 22/12/2020 Mn?Kks"K.Kk Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Pronouncement : 24/02/2021 Vkns'K@ Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. The Present Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A)-3, Jaipur Dated 20/11/2018 For The A.Y. 2011-12. 2. The Hearing Of The Appeal Was Concluded Through Video Conference In View Of The Prevailing Situation Of Covid-19 Pandemic.

For Appellant: Shri Ashok Kumar Bansal (CA)For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary(Addl.CIT)
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(b)

h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: ATZPS 9372 B vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by: Shri Ashok Kumar Bansal (CA) jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Smt. Monisha Choudhary(Addl.CIT) lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@ Date of Hearing : 22/12/2020 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@ Date of Pronouncement : 24/02/2021 vkns'k@ ORDER PER: SANDEEP

GLOBAL HEALTH RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE ,UDAIPUR vs. PR. CIT(CENTRAL), JAIPUR , JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 397/JODH/2019[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur25 Jan 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri B. R. Baskaran & Shri Sandeep Gosain

Section 115BSection 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 153A

H Assessee By Shri P.C. Parwal, CA Revenue By Smt. Alka Rajvanshi Jain (CIT-DR) Date of hearing 03/11/2022 Date of 25 /01/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R PER B.R. BASKARAN, AM The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 23-08-2019 passed by Ld PCIT (Central), Rajasthan cancelling the registration granted to the assessee

M/S. SUNIL & COMPANY,JODHPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 502/JODH/2018[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur03 Aug 2023AY 2004-05

Bench: Its Hearing Before Your Honour.”

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(iii)

section 143(3)/254 of the Income Tax Act, by ACIT, Circle-01, Jodhpur[ here in after reffered to as “ld. AO”]. 2. The assessee has marched this appeal on the following grounds:- “1. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(A) erred in sustaining the disallowance of interest for Rs. 13

ADARSH CREDIT COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result, these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 12/JODH/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur17 Mar 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, HonʼBle & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon'Ble

Section 144Section 86

condone the delay in filing appeal before CIT Appeal and remand the matter to adjudicate on merits. In support to substantiate the cause of delay, he filed an affidavit of the official liquidator certified by Registered Notary. *(Content of the Stamp Paper/Affidavit from Page 4 is supporting evidence; its main points are detailed below)* A Stamp Certificate (Affidavit) from

ADARSH CREDIT COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,AHMEDABAD. vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result, these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical

ITA 5/JODH/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur17 Mar 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, HonʼBle & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon'Ble

Section 144Section 86

condone the delay in filing appeal before CIT Appeal and remand the matter to adjudicate on merits. In support to substantiate the cause of delay, he filed an affidavit of the official liquidator certified by Registered Notary which reads as under: 4 ITA No. 5 to 12/Jodh/2024 Assessment Year 2012-13 to 2019-20 INDIA NON JUDICIALIN-GJ59714587427278W Government

ADARSH CREDIT COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result, these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical

ITA 8/JODH/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur17 Mar 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon'Ble & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon'Ble

Section 144Section 86

condone the delay in filing appeal before CIT Appeal and remand the matter to adjudicate on merits. In support to substantiate the cause of delay, he filed an affidavit of the official liquidator certified by Registered Notary which reads as under: 4 ITA No. 5 to 12/Jodh/2024 Assessment Year

ADARSH CREDIT COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. ,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result, these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical

ITA 11/JODH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur17 Mar 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon'Ble & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon'Ble

Section 144Section 86

condone the delay in filing appeal before CIT Appeal and remand the matter to adjudicate on merits. In support to substantiate the cause of delay, he filed an affidavit of the official liquidator certified by Registered Notary which reads as under: 4 ITA No. 5 to 12/Jodh/2024 Assessment Year 2012-13 to 2019-20 3-BC 10/09/2024 Certificate No. Certificate

ADARSH CREDIT COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result, these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical

ITA 6/JODH/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur17 Mar 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon'Ble & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon'Ble

Section 144Section 86

condone the delay in filing appeal before CIT Appeal and remand the matter to adjudicate on merits. In support to substantiate the cause of delay, he filed an affidavit of the official liquidator certified by Registered Notary which reads as under: 4 ITA No. 5 to 12/Jodh/2024 Assessment Year 2012-13 to 2019-20 Certificate No. Certificate Issued Date Account

ADARSH CREDIT COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. ,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result, these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical

ITA 10/JODH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur17 Mar 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon'Ble & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon'Ble

Section 144Section 86

condone the delay in filing appeal before CIT Appeal and remand the matter to adjudicate on merits. In support to substantiate the cause of delay, he filed an affidavit of the official liquidator certified by Registered Notary which reads as under: 4 ITA No. 5 to 12/Jodh/2024 Assessment Year 2012-13 to 2019-20 Certificate No. : IN-GJ59714567427278W Certificate Issued

ADARSH CREDIT COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result, these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 7/JODH/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur17 Mar 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, HonʼBle & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon'Ble

Section 144Section 86

condone the delay in filing appeal before CIT Appeal and remand the matter to adjudicate on merits. In support to substantiate the cause of delay, he filed an affidavit of the official liquidator certified by Registered Notary which reads as under: INDIA NON JUDICIAL IN-GJ59714587427278W Government of Gujarat सत्यमेव जयते Certificate of Stamp Duty RG. SERIAL NO. 9.86 DATE

M/S. KHADI GRAMMODHYOG PRATISTHAN,BIKANER vs. ADIT, CPC / ITO, WARD-1(2), BANGALURU / BIKANER

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 87/JODH/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur31 Aug 2023AY 2019-20
Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 250(6)

H) also held that suspicion, howsoever strong cannot take the place of legal proof. Honorable, please also look into the working style of the Income Tax Commissioner Appeal. The assessing officer should have accepted the revised return submitted by the assessee which was in accordance with the law and CIT (A) should have accepted the ground and should