SHRI SEWARAM CHARITABLE TRUST ,KOTA vs. ITO, WARD, EXEMPTION, UDAIPUR

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

condonation of delay from the Competent Authority hence, this Circular does not come to its rescue. From the combined reading of section 139(4A) and section 12A

SUKHAD JEEVAN SANSTHAN,CHITTORGARH vs. CIT (EXEMPTION) JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon'Ble & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon'Ble

section (5) of sec. 80G of the Act, it is evident that the time limits prescribed therein is mandatory and the Commissioner of Income Tax has no power to condone the delay in filing application in Form No. 10AB. The said legal position further gets fortified by the fact that the CBDT on multiple occasions had extended the time limit

UMED HOSPITAL MEDICARE RELIEF SOCIETY,JODHPUR vs. DCIT, CPC /ITO, EXEMPTION WARDM,, BANGALORE. JODHPUR

section 11 and 12 shall apply to the case of the assessee Accordingly no exemption is granted u/s 11(2) of the IT Act for the year under consideration In result the appeal of the appellant is dismissed.” 5. As the assessee did not receive any favour from the appeal filed before ld. NFAC/ CIT(A). The present appeal filed

PALI TEXTILE COMMON EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANT,PALI vs. CIT, EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the revenue in ITA No

Bench: Its Hearing Before Your Honour.”

condonation of delay in seeking registration was not available. 8.3 In order to provide relief to such trusts and remove hardship in genuine cases, section 12A

ACIT, CIRCLE (EXEMPTION), , JODHPUR vs. PALI TEXTILE COMMON EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANT, PALI

In the result the appeal of the revenue in ITA No

Bench: Its Hearing Before Your Honour.”

condonation of delay in seeking registration was not available. 8.3 In order to provide relief to such trusts and remove hardship in genuine cases, section 12A

MAHADEVIA CHARITABLE TRUST ,AHMEDABAD vs. PR. CIT(CENTRAL), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri B. R. Baskaran & Shri Sandeep Gosain

condone the delay and admit the appeal for hearing. 3. The facts relating to the case are set out in brief. The assessee herein is a charitable trust providing educational services. It runs a dental college under the name “Ahmedabad Dental College & Hospital”. The assessee was granted registration u/s 12A of the Act on 22.3.1996 subject to certain conditions

GLOBAL HEALTH RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE ,UDAIPUR vs. PR. CIT(CENTRAL), JAIPUR , JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri B. R. Baskaran & Shri Sandeep Gosain

condone the delay and admit the appeal for hearing. 3. The facts relating to the case are set out in brief. The assessee herein is a charitable trust providing educational services. It runs a medical college under the name “M/s Pacific Institute of Medical Science” in Udaipur. The assessee was granted registration u/s 12A of the Act on 05.3.2001, subject

UTTARAKHAND VIKAS SAMITI,UDAIPUR vs. DCIT, CPC / ITO, WARD EXEMPTION, UDAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon’Ble & Shri Sudhir Pareek, Hon’Bleuttarakhand Vikas Samiti Vs. Dcit, Cpc/Ito, Ward Exemption, 117, Main Road, Bhupalpura, Udaipur - 313001 Udaipur - 313001 Pan No. Aaatu 3935 G Assessee By Shri Yogesh Pokharna, C.A. (Physical) Shri K.C. Meena, Addl. Cit-Dr (Virtual) Revenue By Date Of Hearing 13.01.2026. Date Of Pronouncement 28.01.2026. Order Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, A.M.: The Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Appeal, Addl/Jcit (A) Patna [Hereinafter Referred To As “The Jcit Appeal”] Dated 24.01.2025 With Respect To Assessment Year 2018-19 Challenging Therein Confirmation Of Addition Of Rs. 6,00,000/- Without Appreciating Facts Of The Case.

12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It has filed its return of income on 31.08.2018 which was processed u/s 143(1). The society has revised its return of income on 31.03.2019 along with form 10 and audit report u/s 10B claiming set apart income of Rs. 6,00,000/- for which it has passed a resolution

SHREE JAIN SWETAMBER TEERAPANTH MAHILA MANDAL GANGASHAHAR,BIKANER vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA Nos 777 &

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon’Ble & Shri Anikesh Banerjee, Hon’Ble

section 12A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short, ‘the Act’), against application U/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) and U/s 12A(1)(ac)(vi) of the Act date of orders22/02/2024. 2. The appeals were filed with a delay of 163 days. The assessee-trust filed an affidavit explaining the reasons for delay. The Ld.DR has not made any objection

SHREE JAIN SWETAMBER TERAPANTH MAHILA MANDAL GANGASHAHAR,BIKANER vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA Nos 777 &

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon’Ble & Shri Anikesh Banerjee, Hon’Ble

section 12A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short, ‘the Act’), against application U/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) and U/s 12A(1)(ac)(vi) of the Act date of orders22/02/2024. 2. The appeals were filed with a delay of 163 days. The assessee-trust filed an affidavit explaining the reasons for delay. The Ld.DR has not made any objection

SHREE DIGAMBER JAIN DHARM PRABHAVANA SAMITI,UDAIPUR vs. CIT(EXEMTION), JAIPUR

Appeal is dismissed

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon'Ble & Narinder Kumar, Hon'Ble

section 12AB of the Income Tax Act (In short 'the act'). 2. After hearing both the sides and perusal of record, we find that the Ld. CIT exemption has rejected the application filed by the assessee u/s 12A(I)(ac)(iii) in Form No. 10AB seeking registration u/s 12AB of IT Act, 1961 primarily on the ground that the assessee

APNA GHAR ASHRAM,JODHPUR vs. DDIT, CPC / ITO, WARD (EXEMPTION), BANGALORE / JODHPUR

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)

12A(b), and an audit report in Form 10B was issued by a Chartered Accountant on 24.09.2022 and duly uploaded on the e-filing portal. However, the assessee, due to inadvertence and technical oversight, failed to verify the said Form 10B at that time. It was only upon checking the status of return processing that the assessee became aware that

NOBLE EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,BHILWARA vs. ITO (EXEMTION), JODHPUR

In the result, the appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad168/Jodh/2018 (Assessment Year- 2008-09) Vs Noble Educational Society, The Ito Kuwada Road Behind Sophia (Exemption), School, Suwana Road, Ajmer Bhilwara-311001. (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaatn5198G

sections 11 and 12 shall be available in respect of any income derived from property held under trust in any assessment proceeding for an earlier assessment year which is pending before the Assessing Officer as on the date of such registration, if the objects and activities of such trust or institution in the relevant earlier assessment year are the same