BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 112clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka123Chennai118Mumbai89Delhi87Chandigarh75Ahmedabad68Kolkata56Bangalore54Jaipur50Calcutta39Visakhapatnam39Hyderabad36Amritsar36Panaji20Pune20Indore15Surat12Cuttack11Lucknow7Nagpur7Guwahati6SC6Patna5Rajkot5Agra4Raipur4Jodhpur3Allahabad3Cochin3Telangana2Dehradun1Orissa1Andhra Pradesh1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 1546Section 143(1)5Section 143(1)(a)4Section 114Disallowance3Section 139(9)2Section 139(4)2Section 139(1)2Exemption

DUSHKAL GO SEWA SAMITI,SUMERPUR vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), JODHPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 5/JODH/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur06 Oct 2023AY 2018-19
Section 11Section 139(9)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 154

condoning the delay in filing the Audit “D” BENCH, Report in Form No. 10B. AHMEDABAD) 10 SHREE BHAIRAV SEVA We find that the Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court SAMITI vs. INCOME TAX in case of CIT vs. Xavier Kalavani Mandal (P.) OFFICER (2022) 112 TLC Ltd. (supra) held that in order to claim exemption 072 (ITAT, Mumbai) under section

DUSHKAL GO SEWA SAMITI,SUMERPUR vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), JODHPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

2
Condonation of Delay2
Rectification u/s 1542
ITA 9/JODH/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur06 Oct 2023AY 2017-18
Section 11Section 139(9)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 154

condoning the delay in filing the Audit “D” BENCH, Report in Form No. 10B. AHMEDABAD) 10 SHREE BHAIRAV SEVA We find that the Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court SAMITI vs. INCOME TAX in case of CIT vs. Xavier Kalavani Mandal (P.) OFFICER (2022) 112 TLC Ltd. (supra) held that in order to claim exemption 072 (ITAT, Mumbai) under section

M/S. KHADI GRAMMODHYOG PRATISTHAN,BIKANER vs. ADIT, CPC / ITO, WARD-1(2), BANGALURU / BIKANER

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 87/JODH/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur31 Aug 2023AY 2019-20
Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 250(6)

section 250(6) of the Act, it is the duty of the Commissioner (Appeals) to state a point in dispute, record the reasons and pass a speaking order. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Kranti Associates Pvt. Ltd. v. Masood Ahmed Khan (2010) 9 SCC 49% and Canara Bank v. V. K. Awasthy