KAILASH CHANDRA MOONDRA ,SUMERPUR vs. ITO,, SUMERPUR

In the result, ITA No. 334/Jodh/2019 is allowed for statistical purpose and

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

condonation petition. The reason of delay for filing the appeal is that after getting the appeal order U/s 250(6) of the Act, the assessee filed petition u/s 154 and waiting for the rectification

KAILASH CHANDRA MOONDRA ,SUMERPUR vs. ITO,, SUMERPUR

In the result, ITA No. 334/Jodh/2019 is allowed for statistical purpose and

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

condonation petition. The reason of delay for filing the appeal is that after getting the appeal order U/s 250(6) of the Act, the assessee filed petition u/s 154 and waiting for the rectification

DINESH INFRASTRURCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED,JODHPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2, JODHPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

rectification u/s 154 for which the AO passed the order on 13.06.2019 without giving any relief as requested by the assessee. The count of correction statements processed for this quarter as per intimation u/s 154 of the I.T. Act dated 13.06.2019. Dinesh Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. 5. Aggrieved, from the said order of assessment the assessee has filed an appeal before

DINESH INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED,JODHPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2, JODHPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

rectification u/s 154 for which the AO passed the order on 13.06.2019 without giving any relief as requested by the assessee. The count of correction statements processed for this quarter as per intimation u/s 154 of the I.T. Act dated 13.06.2019. Dinesh Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. 5. Aggrieved, from the said order of assessment the assessee has filed an appeal before

SUSHIL KUMAR MARLECHA,PALI vs. DEPUTY/ASSTT, CIT (CPC-TDS) / ITO, TDS-1,, GHAZIABAD / JODHPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Its Hearing Before Your Honour.”

154 of the Act and is also appealable under section 246A. In absence of the power of authority to make such adjustment under section 200A of the Act, any calculation of the fee would not partake the character of the intimation under said provision and it could be argued that such an order would not be open to any rectification

KAUSHALIYA DEVI DHOOT,JODHPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-3, JODHPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon'Ble & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon'Ble

condonation of delay since assessee's application for rectification of the intimation under section 143(1) of the Act has been filed within time and same is pending disposal. With the above said observation, the grounds of the assessee are rejected. ' 5. On perusal of the return filed by the assessee, it is evident that the total income has been