Search: condonation of delay | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “condonation of delay”+ Demonetizationclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai275 Hyderabad149 Bangalore94 Kolkata85 Mumbai85 Delhi82 Ahmedabad68 Patna59 Jaipur58 Pune54 Visakhapatnam52 Lucknow51 Surat34 Chandigarh33 Panaji31 Rajkot29 Amritsar29 Indore26 Agra23 Raipur21 Cuttack16 Allahabad10 Nagpur10 Cochin7 Jodhpur6 Jabalpur4 Dehradun2 Ranchi1 Calcutta1 Varanasi1 Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 153C12 Section 69A5 Addition to Income5 Section 2504 Section 1444 Section 143(3)3 Section 1323 Section 292C3 Cash Deposit

HASTIMAL ,JALORE vs. ITO, WARD-1, JALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 116/JODH/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur07 Dec 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Amit Kothari, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Laxman Singh Gurjar, Sr. DR

demonetization period the delay in filing the appeal may be condoned. The ld. DR has no objection to the request

GEN SINGH,JODHPUR vs. ITO, WARD-3(5), JODHPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes with directions as above

ITA 408/JODH/2023[2017-189]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur30 Oct 2025AY 2017-189

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)

3

Demonetization3

Section 142(1)2

Unexplained Money2

For Appellant: Shri Amit Kothari, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Kumar Gehlot, Addl. CIT DR

Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 144Section 250Section 69A

demonetization period (Nov – Dec 2016) in his SBI account No. 35201240548 and had not filed a return of income for AY 2017-18. Statutory notices u/s 142(1) were issued but remained uncomplied with. The AO therefore completed assessment ex parte u/s 144 treating the deposits as unexplained money u/s 69A and determined total income

ANJANA CONSTRUCTION,NIMBAHERA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR

In the result, revenue’s appeal bearing ITA No

ITA 455/JODH/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur29 Sept 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lal Meena & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

For Respondent: Shri Sakar Sharma

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 250Section 292C

delay for 36 days in filing the appeals is condoned and matter is taken for adjudication. 3. All the appeals have same nature of facts and common issue. So, all the appeals and cross objection are heard together and are disposed of by this common order. Related to ITA Nos 453 & 455/Jodh/2024, these appeals have common facts. Accordingly, ITA No.453/Jodh/2024

ANJANA CONSTRUCTION,NIMBAHERA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR

In the result, revenue’s appeal bearing ITA No

ITA 453/JODH/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur29 Sept 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lal Meena & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

For Respondent: Shri Sakar Sharma

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 250Section 292C

delay for 36 days in filing the appeals is condoned and matter is taken for adjudication. 3. All the appeals have same nature of facts and common issue. So, all the appeals and cross objection are heard together and are disposed of by this common order. Related to ITA Nos 453 & 455/Jodh/2024, these appeals have common facts. Accordingly, ITA No.453/Jodh/2024

ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR vs. ANJANA CONSTRUCTION, CHITTORGARH

In the result, revenue’s appeal bearing ITA No

ITA 313/JODH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur29 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lal Meena & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

For Respondent: Shri Sakar Sharma

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 250Section 292C

delay for 36 days in filing the appeals is condoned and matter is taken for adjudication. 3. All the appeals have same nature of facts and common issue. So, all the appeals and cross objection are heard together and are disposed of by this common order. Related to ITA Nos 453 & 455/Jodh/2024, these appeals have common facts. Accordingly, ITA No.453/Jodh/2024

KAPIL MARLECHA,PALI vs. ITO,WARD-3,, PALI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed

ITA 248/JODH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur30 Oct 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Rajendra Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Kumar Gehlot, Addl. CIT DR

Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 144Section 69A

condone the delay for which sufficient cause is shown, and admit the appeal for adjudication. 4. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the assessee filed his return of income on 30.01.2018 declaring income of Rs.2,36,420/-. The case was selected for limited scrutiny on the issue of cash deposits during the demonetisation period. 4.1 The AO noticed