ACIT, CIRCLE (EXEMPTION), , JODHPUR vs. PALI TEXTILE COMMON EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANT, PALI

In the result the appeal of the revenue in ITA No

Bench: Its Hearing Before Your Honour.”

charitable trust. We dot find any merit in the argument advanced Section 11 of the Act of 1961 provides that subject to the provisions of sections 60

PALI TEXTILE COMMON EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANT,PALI vs. CIT, EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the revenue in ITA No

Bench: Its Hearing Before Your Honour.”

charitable trust. We dot find any merit in the argument advanced Section 11 of the Act of 1961 provides that subject to the provisions of sections 60

M/S. RAJASTHAN VIKAS SANSTHAN ,JODHPUR vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalm/S Rajasthan Vikas Sansthan, Vs. C.I.T.(E) Teesra Prahsar Bhawan, 1St A Jaipur. Road, Sardarpura, Jodhpur. Pan No. Aaatr 3975 P Assessee By Shri P.C. Parwal (Ca) Revenue By Shri K.C. Badhok, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 04.11.2020 Date Of Pronouncement 01/02/2021 O R D E R Per: Bench This Is The Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(E), Jaipur Dated 03/01/2020 Passed U/S 12Aa(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short, The Act). In This Appeal, The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. The Ld. Cit(E) Has Erred On Facts & In Law In Cancelling The Registration Granted To The Assessee U/S 12Aa Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 By Incorrectly Holding That Funds Of The Trust Has Been Diverted For Purchase Of Personal Property Of The Trustees & In Form Of Highly Unreasonable Security Deposits Given To The Trustees Without Charging Interest, Thereby Violating The Provisions Of Section 13(1)(C)(Ii) R.W.S. 13(2)(A) & 13(2)(G) 1.1 The Ld. Cit(E) Has Erred On Facts & In Law In Cancelling The Registration Granted U/S 12Aa Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 By Not Considering The Decision Of Hon’Ble Itat In Assessee’S Own Case Whereby Vide Order Dated 16/12/2011 In Ita No. 11/Jodh/2011 It Was Held That It Case The Trust Fails To Comply With The Requirements As Mentioned In Section 11 & 13 Of The Act, Then Exemption Can Be Denied But Registration Cannot Be Cancelled.

trust has given its properties to other associate concern at a nominal rent and at the same time has taken on rent the properties of the trustees by paying higher rent and also giving substantial security deposit to the trustees in lieu of taking these properties on rent and thus there is violation of section 13(1)(c) r.w.s

APNA GHAR ASHRAM,JODHPUR vs. DDIT, CPC / ITO, WARD (EXEMPTION), BANGALORE / JODHPUR

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)

charitable trust registered under section 12A of the Income Tax Act, filed its return of income for the assessment year 2022–23 on 27.09.2022, declaring nil income after claiming exemption under section 11. The trust had its accounts audited as required under section 12A(b), and an audit report in Form 10B was issued by a Chartered Accountant

BHARAT MATA MANDIR NYAS,BANSWARA vs. ITO, EXEMPTION, UDAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Trust, but for all other purposes they are different, independent entities. That is the reason why Section 10 (23)(c) is worded as under: "Any income received by any person on behalf of..." Here "any person" refers to the assessee and "on behalf of" refers to such institutions. It may be an University, it may be an educational institution

INDIRA EDUCATION INSTITUTE AND HEALTH SOCIETY,UDAIPUR vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), UDAIPUR

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

60,000 per month, which will be paid Rs. 30,000 each to both the Promoters. Furthermore, Rs. 30,00,000 will be given as Advance/ Deposit towards Guaranteed Advance. As against Guaranteed Advances following amount was lying in the accounts with

INDIRA EDUCATION INSTITUTE AND HEALTH SOCIETY,UDAIPUR vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), UDAIPUR

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

60,000 per month, which will be paid Rs. 30,000 each to both the Promoters. Furthermore, Rs. 30,00,000 will be given as Advance/ Deposit towards Guaranteed Advance. As against Guaranteed Advances following amount was lying in the accounts with