SRSL CHARITABLE TRUST ,UDAIPUR vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalsrsl Charitable Trust, Vs. C.I.T.(E) Srsl House, Pulla Bhuwana Jaipur. Road, National Highway No. 8, Udaipur. Pan No. Aaats 3819 F Assessee By Shri P.C. Parwal (Ca) Revenue By Shri K.C. Badhok, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 04.11.2020 Date Of Pronouncement 01/02/2021 O R D E R Per: Bench This Is The Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(E), Jaipur Dated 02/01/2020 Passed U/S 12Aa(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short, The Act). In This Appeal, The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. The Ld. Cit(E) Has Erred On Facts & In Law In Cancelling The Registration Granted To The Assessee U/S 12Aa Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 By Incorrectly Holding That Activities Carried Out By The Assessee Are Not Genuinely Charitable & Also Not Carried Out In Accordance With The Objects Of The Trust. 1.1 The Ld. Cit(E) Has Erred On Facts & In Law In Cancelling The Registration Granted U/S 12Aa Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 By Making Various Incorrect & Irrelevant Observations Particularly Holding That Rental Income Received From Letting Out The Properties Stated To Be Acquired For The Purpose Of Providing Educational Services To The Students Is An Activity Of Commercial In Nature Hit

6 ITA 58/Jodh/2020 SRSL Charitable Trust Vs CIT(E) receipts are in fact being applied only for the purpose of enhancing its rent- earing apparatus. Further, as per proviso to section

BHAMASHAH SUNDARLAL DAGA CHARITABLE TRUST,BIKANER vs. CIT - EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

The appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.278/Jodh/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : N.A. Bhamashah Sundarlal Daga The Commissioner Of Charitable Trust, V Income Tax-Exemption, Bagree Mohallan, S Jaipur. Bikaner – 334001. Pan: Aaetb1013C Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue Assessee By Shri Suresh Ojha – Ar Revenue By Smt. Alka Rajvanshi Jain – Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 14/08/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 10/11/2023

Charitable Trust [A] accepted the claim of the assessee of granting registration for 80G of Income Tax Act. 3. That the assessee full fill all the requirement/condition of the law as provided regarding obtaining registration under section 80G of the IT Act therefore the order of the CIT(E) is liable for quash. 4. Without prejudice when registration has been

SHRI SEWARAM CHARITABLE TRUST ,KOTA vs. ITO, WARD, EXEMPTION, UDAIPUR

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

Charitable Trust Vs. DCIT(E) ITA No.1528/M/2022 order dt. 31.10.2022 (Mum.) (Trib.) The relevant para 5 to 7 is reproduced as under:- 5. Undisputedly, the assessee trust has filed return of income for the year under consideration on 07.11.2017 well within time, which was processed under section 143(1) of the Act dated 26.03.2019 by Dy. Commissioner of Income

SHREE VISHWAKARMA SUTRADHAR SAMPATI TRUST,BIKANER vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION, BIKANER

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed in above terms

Bench: Hearing On The Case.

charitable trust and duly constituted under its constitution under Indian Trust Act. The assessee e-filed its return of income on 10.01.2018 in ITR-7 along with audit report in Form 10B declaring total income of Rs. Nil. The case was selected for scrutiny under compulsory criteria, accordingly first notice under section

MADHAV UNIVERSITY,PINDWARA, SIROHI vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon'Ble & Shri Anikesh Banerjee, Hon'Bleι.Τ.Α No.789 &790/Jodh/2024 (Assessment Year:2024-25) Madhav University Vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Exemption, Jaipur Pindwara, Madhav Hills, Nh 27, Vpo Bharja, Pindwara, Sirohi Rajasthan-307023 Pan: Aasam7855L Shri Amit Kothari Shri M.K. Jain, Cit(Dr.) Present For Assessee Present For Revenue Date Of Hearing 20/08/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 22/08/2025 Order Per Bench: The Instant Appeals Of The Assessee Filed Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Exemption), Jaipur (For Brevity, 'Ld.Cit(E)'] Order Passed Under Section 12Ab Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (In Short, 'The Act') & Order Passed Under Section 80G(5) Of The Act, Date Of Orders 30/09/2024. 2. Act Both The Appeals Related To Registration Under Section 12Ab& 80G Of The

charitable activity" would not become "trade, commerce or business"-If the surplus is being applied towards the objects of the trust or being accumulated as provided in the scheme, then nothing is taxable-Thus, assessee is entitled for benefit of ss. 11 and 12. 6. Section

DUSHKAL GO SEWA SAMITI,SUMERPUR vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), JODHPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

6) and uploaded revised Form 10B online on 30.08.2020. (D) Thereafter, appellant trust also filed application for condonation of delay before Hon’ble CBDT, New Delhi vide letter dated 26.04.2021 (P.B. No. 07-08) but appellant- trust did not get any communication or notice or order from the Hon’ble CBDT. Thereafter, Appellant trust also submitted reminders letter

DUSHKAL GO SEWA SAMITI,SUMERPUR vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), JODHPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

6) and uploaded revised Form 10B online on 30.08.2020. (D) Thereafter, appellant trust also filed application for condonation of delay before Hon’ble CBDT, New Delhi vide letter dated 26.04.2021 (P.B. No. 07-08) but appellant- trust did not get any communication or notice or order from the Hon’ble CBDT. Thereafter, Appellant trust also submitted reminders letter

SHRIYA DEVI MATA MANDIR PRAJAPAT SAMAJ SEVA SANSTHAN,RAJSAMAND vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), JAIPUR

In the result both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon'Ble & Shri Udayan Das Gupta, Hon'Ble

6.- We have heard the rival contention and perused the material available on record. On perusal of objects of the assessee, it is abundantly clear that the assessee is engaged in the charitable activities of public welfare towards construction and running Dharamshala at no-profit- no loss" vide amended trust deed dated 26/03/2024 as claimed that for purposes the assessee

PALI TEXTILE COMMON EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANT,PALI vs. CIT, EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the revenue in ITA No

Bench: Its Hearing Before Your Honour.”

6. The facts of the case is that the assessee trust is registered u/s. 12AA of the Income Tax Act by the Commissioner of Income Tax, (Exemption), Jaipur [ here in after referred as CIT(E) ] vide order dated 04.07.2016 w.e.f. 10.06.2016. The trust was constituted on 26.12.2015 and amended trust deed dated 10.06.2016. The main object of the trust

ACIT, CIRCLE (EXEMPTION), , JODHPUR vs. PALI TEXTILE COMMON EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANT, PALI

In the result the appeal of the revenue in ITA No

Bench: Its Hearing Before Your Honour.”

6. The facts of the case is that the assessee trust is registered u/s. 12AA of the Income Tax Act by the Commissioner of Income Tax, (Exemption), Jaipur [ here in after referred as CIT(E) ] vide order dated 04.07.2016 w.e.f. 10.06.2016. The trust was constituted on 26.12.2015 and amended trust deed dated 10.06.2016. The main object of the trust

ACIT, CIRCLE (EXEMPTION), JODHPUR vs. M/S. VIDYA BHAWAN SOCIETY, UDAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Kul Bharatshri Manish Boradacit, Vs M/S. Vidya Bhawan Circle (Exemption), Society, Mohan Singh, Jodhpur Mehta Marg, Fatehpur, Udaipur (Raj.) (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Assessee By Shri Amit Kothari, Ca Revenue By Shri S.M.Joshi, Jcit Dr Date Of Hearing 23/03/2023 Date Of 24/03/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R Per Kul Bharat, J.M.: The Present Appeal Filed By The Revenue For The Assessment Year 2014-15 Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Cit(A)-1, Udaipur Dated 27.06.2019. The Revenue Has Raised Following Grounds Of Appeal:-

6, 1984, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes [152 ITR (St.) 1] also supports this proposition. Section 164 (2) refers to the relevant income which is derived from property held under trust wholly for charitable

UMED HOSPITAL MEDICARE RELIEF SOCIETY,JODHPUR vs. DCIT, CPC /ITO, EXEMPTION WARDM,, BANGALORE. JODHPUR

charitable or religious purpose. There was no standard format for exercising the option. Accordingly, the provisions of section 11 have also been amended to prescribe a format for exercise of option by the trust/institution for the purposes of clause (2) of the Explanation to sub-section (1) of section 11 of the income-tax Act. 5.6.4 Applicability These amendments take

M/S. RAJASTHAN VIKAS SANSTHAN ,JODHPUR vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalm/S Rajasthan Vikas Sansthan, Vs. C.I.T.(E) Teesra Prahsar Bhawan, 1St A Jaipur. Road, Sardarpura, Jodhpur. Pan No. Aaatr 3975 P Assessee By Shri P.C. Parwal (Ca) Revenue By Shri K.C. Badhok, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 04.11.2020 Date Of Pronouncement 01/02/2021 O R D E R Per: Bench This Is The Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(E), Jaipur Dated 03/01/2020 Passed U/S 12Aa(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short, The Act). In This Appeal, The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. The Ld. Cit(E) Has Erred On Facts & In Law In Cancelling The Registration Granted To The Assessee U/S 12Aa Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 By Incorrectly Holding That Funds Of The Trust Has Been Diverted For Purchase Of Personal Property Of The Trustees & In Form Of Highly Unreasonable Security Deposits Given To The Trustees Without Charging Interest, Thereby Violating The Provisions Of Section 13(1)(C)(Ii) R.W.S. 13(2)(A) & 13(2)(G) 1.1 The Ld. Cit(E) Has Erred On Facts & In Law In Cancelling The Registration Granted U/S 12Aa Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 By Not Considering The Decision Of Hon’Ble Itat In Assessee’S Own Case Whereby Vide Order Dated 16/12/2011 In Ita No. 11/Jodh/2011 It Was Held That It Case The Trust Fails To Comply With The Requirements As Mentioned In Section 11 & 13 Of The Act, Then Exemption Can Be Denied But Registration Cannot Be Cancelled.

trust has given its properties to other associate concern at a nominal rent and at the same time has taken on rent the properties of the trustees by paying higher rent and also giving substantial security deposit to the trustees in lieu of taking these properties on rent and thus there is violation of section 13(1)(c) r.w.s

MAHADEVIA CHARITABLE TRUST,GANDHINAGAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, APPEAL UDAIPUR -2 , UDAIPUR

In the result, both these appeals are allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon’Ble & Shri Sudhir Pareek, Hon’Ble

trust from its entitlement to the benefit of Section 11 of the Income Tax Act as observed by the AO vide Para 13 of the Assessment Order. The counsel has referred to the provision of Section 11(6) which reads as under: “In this section where any income is required to be applied or accumulated or set apart for application

MAHADEVIA CHARITABLE TRUST,GANDHINAGAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, UDAIPUR

In the result, both these appeals are allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon’Ble & Shri Sudhir Pareek, Hon’Ble

trust from its entitlement to the benefit of Section 11 of the Income Tax Act as observed by the AO vide Para 13 of the Assessment Order. The counsel has referred to the provision of Section 11(6) which reads as under: “In this section where any income is required to be applied or accumulated or set apart for application

MAHADEVIA CHARITABLE TRUST ,AHMEDABAD vs. PR. CIT(CENTRAL), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri B. R. Baskaran & Shri Sandeep Gosain

Charitable Trust are not genuine and are not being carried out in accordance with the objects of the assessee-trust. Therefore, the registration of the assessee-society u/s 12A is hereby cancelled by invoking section 12AA(3) with effect from 1.4.2009, i.e., financial year from which irregularities in the functioning of the assessee have come to notice. I am also

APNA GHAR ASHRAM,JODHPUR vs. DDIT, CPC / ITO, WARD (EXEMPTION), BANGALORE / JODHPUR

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)

Section 148 of the Act of even date. 5.1 We also rely upon the order of the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in case of Navjeevan Charitable Trust v. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption) [2024] 166 taxmann.com 725 (Gujarat) wherein it was held as under: 6

JAS KARAN AMRAV DEVI BOTHRA CHARITABLE TRUST,BIKANER vs. CIT (EXEMPTION),, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assesse is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri Dr. Dipak P. Ripotejas Karan Amrav Devi Vs. Cit (Exemptions), Bothra Charitable Trust Kailash Heights,3 Rdflr, C/O. Surana & Co., Lalkothi,Tonk Road, 13/14, Industrial Area, Jaipur-302015. Rani Bazar, Bikaner. Rajasthan. Rajasthan. Pan/Gir No. : Aabtj4574F Appellant .. Respondent Assessee By : None Revenue By : Smt. Alka Rajvanshi Jain, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 08.08.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 09.08.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale Jm: The Assessee Has Filed The Appeal Challenging The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Jaipur Rejecting The Registration Application U/S 12Aa(1)(B) Of The Act.

section 12AA of the Act, whereas the CIT(E) in course of hearing proceedings has called for certain clarifications and additional information to verify the genuineness of the activities of the trust and as per clause IV & VIII of the trust deed, they are non Jas karan Amrav Devi botra Charitable Trust, Bikaner. charitable clauses. The contentions raised

AJMER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,AJMER vs. CIT(EXEMPTION)/ ITO (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR / JODHPUR

In the result, the stay application filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Kul Bharatshri Manish Borad

charitable if an institution is engaged in “trade, commerce or business” or provides any service relating to “trade, commerce or business” for which cess, fee or other consideration is received. In the case in hand, the AO despite 44 | P a g e having recorded that though the assessee trust’s activity fall under the ambit of “general public utility