AJMER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,AJMER vs. CIT(EXEMPTION)/ ITO (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR / JODHPUR

In the result, the stay application filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Kul Bharatshri Manish Borad

iv) though the notice under s. 148(2) does not include a particular issue with respect to which income has escaped assessment, he may nonetheless, assess or reassess the income in respect of any issue which has escaped assessment and which comes to his notice subsequently in the course of the proceedings under the section

UMED HOSPITAL MEDICARE RELIEF SOCIETY,JODHPUR vs. DCIT, CPC /ITO, EXEMPTION WARDM,, BANGALORE. JODHPUR

charitable or religious purpose. There was no standard format for exercising the option. Accordingly, the provisions of section 11 have also been amended to prescribe a format for exercise of option by the trust/institution for the purposes of clause (2) of the Explanation to sub-section (1) of section 11 of the income-tax Act. 5.6.4 Applicability These amendments take

SUKHAD JEEVAN SANSTHAN,CHITTORGARH vs. CIT (EXEMPTION) JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon'Ble & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon'Ble

iv) of first proviso to sub-section (5) of sec. 80G of the Act and therefore, the applicant/assessee was required to file application in Form No. IOAB u/s clause (iii) of first proviso to subsection (5) of sec. 80G of the Act within the time period of at least six months prior to expiry of period of the provisional approval