BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 234Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai85Delhi53Bangalore48Jaipur28Lucknow21Karnataka21Chennai17Ahmedabad17Kolkata16Pune10Hyderabad7Indore6Rajkot2Chandigarh2Nagpur2Jodhpur2Visakhapatnam1Allahabad1Cuttack1Guwahati1Jabalpur1Patna1Ranchi1SC1Surat1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 118Section 12A4Section 11(2)4Section 2502Section 143(1)(a)2Exemption2Addition to Income2

UMED HOSPITAL MEDICARE RELIEF SOCIETY,JODHPUR vs. DCIT, CPC /ITO, EXEMPTION WARDM,, BANGALORE. JODHPUR

ITA 175/JODH/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur06 Oct 2023AY 2015-16
Section 11Section 11(2)Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 250Section 288

trust has contravened the provisions of section 11(2) of the IT Act and consequently nothing contained in the provisions of Section 11 and 12 shall apply to the case of assessee.(Para 5.8 of the order) Therefore the appellant appeals for set aside the impugned order dated 26.10.2022 and order for allowing the exemption

AKHIL BHARTIYA BRAHMKSHTRIY DHARAMSHALA TRUST ,RAMDEORA, POKARAN vs. ITO, EXEMPTION, JODHPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 244/JODH/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur29 May 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: BEFOREDR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member), SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE (Judicial Member)

Section 11(1)(d)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 234ASection 250

sections 143(3A) & 143(3B) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, date of order 18/02/2021. ITA No.244/JODH/2024 Akhil Bhartiy Brahmkshtriy Dharamshala Trust The assessee has taken the following grounds of appeal:- "1. The Id. CIT(A) has erred in sustaining the assessment order framed by the Id. AO which is bad in law and bad on facts. The order passed