BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “capital gains”+ Section 260Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi466Karnataka152Mumbai137Calcutta120Kolkata85Chennai49Telangana42Bangalore28Ahmedabad22SC22Jaipur18Nagpur17Lucknow13Indore8Raipur7Surat7Hyderabad6Kerala6Amritsar5Punjab & Haryana5Pune4Agra4Orissa3Allahabad3Visakhapatnam2Dehradun2Jodhpur2Panaji1Gauhati1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Cochin1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)4Section 1482Section 50C2Addition to Income2

SHAHNAJ,NEAR BHERUDANJI WELL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, INCOME TAX OFFICE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 712/JODH/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur01 Jan 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Dr Mitha Lal Meenasmt. Shanaj Vs The Ito W/O Shri Aslam Khan Ward-2, Churu, Near Bherudan Ji Well,Ward No. 22 Churu Sardarshahar,Churu – 331 403 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Fpmps 3570 D

Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 50CSection 54F

capital gain on the basis of the report of the Inspector and he did not believe the report of the Tehsildar. We agree with the opinion of the learned CIT(Appeals) that he should have requested the higher authorities of the State Government if he did not believe his report to be correct or he could have summoned the Tehsildar

SMT. JAYA MOGRA,UDAIPUR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 333/JODH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur20 Sept 2023AY 2009-10
Section 127Section 132Section 271(1)(c)

260A or an appeal to the Supreme Court under section 261 or revision under section 263 or section 264 and an order imposing or enhancing or reducing or cancelling penalty or dropping the proceedings for the imposition of penalty is passed before the order of60[the Joint Commissioner (Appeals) or] the Commissioner (Appeals) or the Appellate Tribunal or the High