SHAHNAJ,NEAR BHERUDANJI WELL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, INCOME TAX OFFICE
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 712/JODH/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur01 Jan 2025AY 2013-14
Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Dr Mitha Lal Meenasmt. Shanaj Vs The Ito W/O Shri Aslam Khan Ward-2, Churu, Near Bherudan Ji Well,Ward No. 22 Churu Sardarshahar,Churu – 331 403 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Fpmps 3570 D
Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 50CSection 54F
gain tax on ground that agricultural land could not be considered to be a capital asset under section 2(14) - Revenue authorities rejected assessee’s claim holding that agricultural land was located within radius of 8 Kms. from limits of municipality ‘H’ - Whether since entire transaction was made through revenue authorities located in municipality ‘R’, it was to be held
