Search: capital gains

4 results for “capital gains”+ Section 10(2)(xv)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai125 Delhi110 Chandigarh83 Jaipur37 Hyderabad29 SC28 Guwahati21 Amritsar11 Nagpur11 Bangalore10 Ahmedabad7 Raipur7 Surat5 Chennai5 Lucknow5 Jodhpur4 Pune4 Kolkata3 Cochin3 Visakhapatnam2 Ranchi1 Dehradun1 Patna1

Key Topics

Section 1476 Disallowance4 Addition to Income4 Section 143(1)3 Section 143(3)2 Section 682

M/S. SUNIL & COMPANY,JODHPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 502/JODH/2018[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur03 Aug 2023AY 2004-05

Bench: Its Hearing Before Your Honour.”

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(iii)

section 143(3)/254 of the Income Tax Act, by ACIT, Circle-01, Jodhpur[ here in after reffered to as “ld. AO”]. 2. The assessee has marched this appeal on the following grounds:- “1. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(A) erred in sustaining the disallowance of interest

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, UDIPUR vs. M/S. WAGAD CONSTRUTION COMPANY, UDAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 30/JODH/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur

M/S. SUNIL & COMPANY,JODHPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, UDIPUR vs. M/S. WAGAD CONSTRUTION COMPANY, UDAIPUR

M/S. SUNIL & COMPANY,JODHPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, UDIPUR vs. M/S. WAGAD CONSTRUTION COMPANY, UDAIPUR

SAMPAT LAL LODHA ,NATHDWARA vs. ITO, WARD-2, RAJSAMAND

SAMPAT LAL LODHA ,NATHDWARA vs. ITO, WARD-2, RAJSAMAND