Search: capital gains

7 results for “capital gains”+ Penny Stockclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 153A16 Section 10(38)7 Addition to Income7 Section 143(3)6 Section 1325 Section 139(1)4 Section 684 Long Term Capital Gains4 Bogus/Accommodation Entry

ASST COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BIKANER vs. MUKESH SHAH, SRIGANGANAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 399/JODH/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur08 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 24

penny has been shown as advance amount paid to any party for purchasing their land therefore, the claim of the assessee regarding negotiation for procurement of land is not acceptable. In view of the above discussion, the cash deposit of Rs 80,00,000/- was added to income of the assessee under the provisions of section 68 r.w.s. 115BBE

ASST COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BIKANER vs. MUKESH SHAH, SRIGANGANAGAR

RACHNA GOYAL,JODHPUR vs. ITO, WARD-1(2), JODHPUR

ASST COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BIKANER vs. MUKESH SHAH, SRIGANGANAGAR

RACHNA GOYAL,JODHPUR vs. ITO, WARD-1(2), JODHPUR

ASHOK PANWAR HUF,JODHPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, JODHPUR

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JODHPUR vs. KALAWATI DEVI, PALI

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JODHPUR, JODHPUR vs. SOHANRAJ BALAR, PALI

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JODHPUR vs. PRAVEEN BALAR, PALI

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JODHPUR vs. VINESH KUMAR BALAR, PALI