ASHOK PANWAR HUF,JODHPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, JODHPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assesses ITA No

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon'Ble & Shri Anikesh Banerjee, Hon'Ble

purchased 2800 shares on 09/03/2012 for Rs.2,80,000/-. The said scrip was sold in the financial year 2014-15 for Rs,.1,58,67,077/- through the broker, Shri Suresh Rathi. The assessee claimed exemption of the LTCG of Rs.1,55,87,077/- u/s 10(38) of the Act. The Ld.AO has treated the entire transaction as bogus

ASHIANA BUILDPROP PRIVATE LIMITED,UDAIPUR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1 UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

67,50,000/- in A.Y. 2015-16 and Rs.57,50,000/- in A.Y. 2016-\n17 on account of alleged extra business receipts on account of charges as treating\nundisclosed business income on estimate basis without invoking the provision of\nsec.145(3) and without rejecting the books of accounts, also erred in not considering the\nmaterial and details in their true

ASHIANA BUILDPROP PRIVATE LIMITED,UDAIPUR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, UDIAPUR, UDAIPUR

Bench: DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member), DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

67,50,000/- in A.Y. 2015-16 and Rs.57,50,000/- in A.Y. 2016- 17 on account of alleged extra business receipts on account of charges as treating undisclosed business income on estimate basis without invoking the provision of sec.145(3) and without rejecting the books of accounts, also erred in not considering the material and details in their true

ASHIANA BUILDPROP PRIVATE LIMITED,UDAIPUR vs. DCIT- CENTRAL CIRCLE-1 UDIAPUR, UDAIPUE

67,50,000/- in A.Y. 2015-16 and Rs.57,50,000/- in A.Y. 2016-\n17 on account of alleged extra business receipts on account of charges as treating\nundisclosed business income on estimate basis without invoking the provision of\nsec.145(3) and without rejecting the books of accounts, also erred in not considering the\nmaterial and details in their true

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, UDIPUR vs. M/S. WAGAD CONSTRUTION COMPANY, UDAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

bogus - Held, yes - Whether since Assessing Officer had drawn an adverse conclusion only on account of non-verifiability of sundry creditors but there being no dispute as regards purchases and trading results having been accepted, addition made under section 68 was not sustainable - Held, yes [Paras 15.2 & 15.3] [In favour of assessee]" In the case of Continental Carbon India

RACHNA GOYAL,JODHPUR vs. ITO, WARD-1(2), JODHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

bogus LTCG against cash\nand the buyers are ensured delivery of cash against such pre-determined purchase\nof shares. The buyer and seller parties are well planned in the transaction as only in\nsuch scenario, the case is assured to the buyer and sale proceeds of shares are\nassured in the bank account linked with the demat account of seller

ASST COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BIKANER vs. MUKESH SHAH, SRIGANGANAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

Section 2(13) of the IT Act which reads as under: "Business" includes any trading, commerce or manufacture or any adventure or concern in the nature of trade, commerce or manufacture." The above definition has used the words 'trade' 'commerce' or 'manufacture' or "any adventure or concern in the nature of trade, commerce or manufacture". The Hon'ble Gujarat High

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR vs. M/S MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD., UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

67,100/- to be disallowed in F.Y. 2017-18 relevant to A.Y. 2018-19 out of the non-verifiable cash payments related to anaesthesia, Mewar Hospital Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT and further, as the verifiability of these expenses could not be ascertained by the AO since the appellant failed to get verified the cash payments related to anaesthesia amounting

MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

67,100/- to be disallowed in F.Y. 2017-18 relevant to A.Y. 2018-19 out of the non-verifiable cash payments related to anaesthesia, Mewar Hospital Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT and further, as the verifiability of these expenses could not be ascertained by the AO since the appellant failed to get verified the cash payments related to anaesthesia amounting

MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

67,100/- to be disallowed in F.Y. 2017-18 relevant to A.Y. 2018-19 out of the non-verifiable cash payments related to anaesthesia, Mewar Hospital Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT and further, as the verifiability of these expenses could not be ascertained by the AO since the appellant failed to get verified the cash payments related to anaesthesia amounting

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR vs. M/S MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD., UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

67,100/- to be disallowed in F.Y. 2017-18 relevant to A.Y. 2018-19 out of the non-verifiable cash payments related to anaesthesia, Mewar Hospital Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT and further, as the verifiability of these expenses could not be ascertained by the AO since the appellant failed to get verified the cash payments related to anaesthesia amounting

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR vs. M/S MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD., UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

67,100/- to be disallowed in F.Y. 2017-18 relevant to A.Y. 2018-19 out of the non-verifiable cash payments related to anaesthesia, Mewar Hospital Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT and further, as the verifiability of these expenses could not be ascertained by the AO since the appellant failed to get verified the cash payments related to anaesthesia amounting

MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

67,100/- to be disallowed in F.Y. 2017-18 relevant to A.Y. 2018-19 out of the non-verifiable cash payments related to anaesthesia, Mewar Hospital Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT and further, as the verifiability of these expenses could not be ascertained by the AO since the appellant failed to get verified the cash payments related to anaesthesia amounting

MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

67,100/- to be disallowed in F.Y. 2017-18 relevant to A.Y. 2018-19 out of the non-verifiable cash payments related to anaesthesia, Mewar Hospital Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT and further, as the verifiability of these expenses could not be ascertained by the AO since the appellant failed to get verified the cash payments related to anaesthesia amounting

MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

67,100/- to be disallowed in F.Y. 2017-18 relevant to A.Y. 2018-19 out of the non-verifiable cash payments related to anaesthesia, Mewar Hospital Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT and further, as the verifiability of these expenses could not be ascertained by the AO since the appellant failed to get verified the cash payments related to anaesthesia amounting

MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

67,100/- to be disallowed in F.Y. 2017-18 relevant to A.Y. 2018-19 out of the non-verifiable cash payments related to anaesthesia, Mewar Hospital Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT and further, as the verifiability of these expenses could not be ascertained by the AO since the appellant failed to get verified the cash payments related to anaesthesia amounting

ACIT, PAOTA C ROAD vs. VARAHA INFRA LIMITED, PAOTA B ROAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Rathod Kamlesh Jayantbhaithe Acit Vs M/S. Vardha Infra Ltd. Room No. 215, Aayakar Bhawan 6 Jalam Vilas Scheme Paota C Road, Jodhpur Paota B Road, Jodhpur (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaccv 7972 K

bogus. The A.O. also that the assessee had claimed net loss of 6 97% as compared to the net profit rate of 7.23% shown in the immediate preceeding year, therefore, books of account are liable to be rejected. After making comparsion of net profit of last three years, the A. O. applied net profit rate of 7.6% to the total