SARDA DEVI CHECHANI,UDAIPUR vs. ITO TDS , UDAIPU

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

164/ 13 14 5. Against this assessee has filed appeal before the Honble CIT(A). The assessee has filed WS and details by stating that During the course of assessment proceedings, I have filed the Form 27C duly signed by the purchaser and which clearly mentions that purchase was done for further manufacturing of other products. In section 206C

SARDA DEVI CHECHANI,UDAIPUR vs. ITO TDS, UDAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

164/ 13 14 5. Against this assessee has filed appeal before the Honble CIT(A). The assessee has filed WS and details by stating that During the course of assessment proceedings, I have filed the Form 27C duly signed by the purchaser and which clearly mentions that purchase was done for further manufacturing of other products. In section 206C

ITO, WARD, PHALODI, PHALODI vs. M/S RAMA ALLURE LLP, JODHPUR

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: The Date, The Appeal Is Finally Heard.”

164]. f. Copy of Bank statement (NRE Account) from which the funds were transferred to NRO Account. [P. B. Page No.165 to 169] g. Copy of foreign Bank account from where the funds were transferred to NRE account. [P. B. Page No.170 to 173]. h. Copy of audited financials of Aptus Trading Corporation, Dubai which owned by Aprit Khendelwal