127), which have been ignored by both the lower authorities despite available on record. 2.4 The ld., CIT(A) has stated that the arguments of the appellant are considered but not found acceptable. It is incorrect to say that there was material difference because of 15 ITA Nos. 706 to 709/Jodh/2024 Ashiana Buildprop Pvt. Ltd., Udaipur. change of name