BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 108clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai511Delhi239Jaipur123Karnataka101Bangalore84Kolkata71Chennai63Cochin59Ahmedabad51Chandigarh44Hyderabad41Surat38Indore37Calcutta34Rajkot30Nagpur24Pune20Raipur18Agra16Cuttack15Lucknow13Jodhpur2Telangana2Visakhapatnam1Amritsar1Gauhati1Guwahati1Jabalpur1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 1474Section 143(3)2Section 402Section 1482Section 153C2Addition to Income2

SHRI JITENDRA OJHA ,SIROHI vs. ITO,, SIROHI

In the result appeal of assessee is allowed in terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 484/JODH/2018[Shri Jitendra Ojha ]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur19 Mar 2020

Bench: Shri R.C.Sharma, Accountant Mrmber Shri Jiterndra Ojha Vs The Ito, S/O Sh. Mangi Lal Ojha , Sirohi. Chhoti Brahmpuri, Sirohi.

Section 132Section 139Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(1)Section 149Section 153Section 153ASection 153C

108 (Mad.)- Gitsons Engineering Co. Vs. CIT. 4. The without prejudice to the generality of the ground No. 1 & 2above. It is alternatively urged that in the facts and circumstances of the case, the impugned reopening of the asset invoking Sec. 147 to 151 was without jurisdiction and contrary to the legal provisions contained in Sec. 153C read with

ACIT, PAOTA C ROAD vs. VARAHA INFRA LIMITED, PAOTA B ROAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 160/JODH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur01 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Rathod Kamlesh Jayantbhaithe Acit Vs M/S. Vardha Infra Ltd. Room No. 215, Aayakar Bhawan 6 Jalam Vilas Scheme Paota C Road, Jodhpur Paota B Road, Jodhpur (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaccv 7972 K

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40

108/-), guest entertainment expenses (Rs. 27,45,595/-), travelling and conveyance (Rs. 1,33,23,009/-) it was found that most of the expenses were incurred in cash for which proper details has not been either maintained or filed during the course of the assessment proceedings. The assessee had also not maintained site-wise stock register of consumable goods debited