BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “bogus purchases”+ Revision u/s 263clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai261Delhi183Jaipur136Kolkata123Karnataka104Bangalore52Chandigarh50Ahmedabad41Chennai38Rajkot36Indore31Pune28Surat22Hyderabad19Agra19Lucknow17Nagpur11Raipur9Amritsar6Jodhpur4Patna4Cuttack3Ranchi3Guwahati3Dehradun2Jabalpur2Visakhapatnam1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 153A8Section 1324Section 145(3)4Addition to Income4Section 142(1)2Section 2502Section 234A2Natural Justice2

ITO, WARD-2, HANUMANGARH vs. SMT. LALITA SARAF , HANUMANGARH TOWN

In the result, the appeals of the Department are dismissed and the Cross objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 551/JODH/2018[ 2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur06 May 2019

Bench: Shri N.K. Sainithe Income Tax Officer, Vs Smt. Lalita Saraf, Ward-2, Hanumangarh C/O Mangi Lal Saraf, In Front Of Mandi Studio, Hanumangarh Town

Section 12A

Revision of monetary limits for filing of appeals by the Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts and SLPs/appeals before Supreme Court-measures for reducing litigation-Reg. Reference is invited to Board’s Circular No. 21 of 2015 dated 10.12.2015 wherein monetary limits and other conditions for filing departmental appeals (in Income-tax matters) before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

ITO, WARD, PHALODI, PHALODI vs. M/S RAMA ALLURE LLP, JODHPUR

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 135/JODH/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur09 Oct 2023
AY 2020-21

Bench: The Date, The Appeal Is Finally Heard.”

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

revision by the Commissioner under section 263 by exercising revisional power and order was passed. 31 ITO vs. Ms Rama Allure LLP - On appeal, the Tribunal allowed the same. Held as under- “Where the assessee has given supporting material evidencing the gift or the amount received from the particular person with necessary documents, such as, copies of demand drafts

ASHIANA BUILDPROP PRIVATE LIMITED,UDAIPUR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1 UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 708/JODH/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur26 May 2025AY 2015-16
Section 132Section 145(3)Section 153ASection 234ASection 250

purchased flats from the company but\nthe transactions mentioned in this ledger accounts were not executed with the company.\nThis is again avoiding tactics even when the assessee company has been caught with the\nevidences of cash transaction. There is cash transaction as recorded on these documents\nwith the flat purchasers, which is proved from these documents. The assessee company

ASHIANA BUILDPROP PRIVATE LIMITED,UDAIPUR vs. DCIT- CENTRAL CIRCLE-1 UDIAPUR, UDAIPUE

ITA 707/JODH/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur26 May 2025AY 2014-15
Section 132Section 145(3)Section 153ASection 234ASection 250

Revised 2012)} for your ready reference. (PB….) Kindly refer\nClause(d) of sub-para 9.2. under the main head Disclosure para -9 duly highlighted.\nAs the assessee company has adopted the POC method which is the only correct method\nfor income tax purposes considering the various terms and conditions and facts of the\ncase for such recognition of revenue. Hence