Search: TDS | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “TDS”+ Survey u/s 133Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai529 Delhi433 Bangalore285 Kolkata127 Hyderabad115 Chennai98 Patna78 Jaipur78 Chandigarh46 Raipur46 Ahmedabad33 Visakhapatnam25 Pune23 Rajkot23 Lucknow23 Indore20 Agra16 Panaji16 Surat16 Guwahati13 Nagpur13 Jodhpur10 Cochin7 Varanasi4 Allahabad3 Ranchi2 Jabalpur2 Dehradun2 Telangana1 Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 15420 Section 194A18 Section 194C16 Section 201(1)15 Section 133A10 Survey u/s 133A10 Section 2016 Section 194A(3)6 Section 2505 Deduction

DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FOREST FOREST BHILWARA,BHILWARA vs. CIT, DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 98/JODH/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur02 Nov 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Sunil Porwal, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Meenakshi Vohra, CIT-DR

Section 133ASection 194CSection 201(1)

survey u/s 133A(2A) of I.T. Act on 17.10.2019 so as to verify whether the appellant as a deductor is deducting tax at source (TDS

DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FOREST FOREST BHILWARA,BHILWARA vs. CIT APPEAL, DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

5

Addition to Income5

ITA 99/JODH/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur02 Nov 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Sunil Porwal, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Meenakshi Vohra, CIT-DR

Section 133ASection 194CSection 201(1)

survey u/s 133A(2A) of I.T. Act on 17.10.2019 so as to verify whether the appellant as a deductor is deducting tax at source (TDS

KANAK KUMAR JAIN L/H OF PARTNER OF M/S. KESARIYAJI FILLING STATION,UDAIPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 67/JODH/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur01 May 2025AY 2015-16

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Lodha (CA)For Respondent: Shri Karni Dan, Addl. CIT

Section 133ASection 148Section 154Section 189(3)Section 234ASection 234CSection 250Section 292BSection 42

133A of the IT\nAct was conducted on 03.12.2016 at the business premises of the firm situated at Rishabdeo.\nDuring and post survey proceedings the ADIT (Inv.)-II, Udaipur found that assessee firm was\nnot maintaining any books of accounts. As per assessee's submission during survey total sales /\nreceipts during FY 2010-11 relevant

KANAK KUMAR JAIN L/H OF PARTNER OF M/S. KESARIYAJI FILLING STATION,UDAIPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 64/JODH/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur01 May 2025AY 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Lodha (CA)For Respondent: Shri Karni Dan, Addl. CIT

Section 133ASection 148Section 154Section 189(3)Section 234ASection 234CSection 250Section 292BSection 42

133A of the IT\nAct was conducted on 03.12.2016 at the business premises of the firm situated at Rishabdeo.\nDuring and post survey proceedings the ADIT (Inv.)-II, Udaipur found that assessee firm was\nnot maintaining any books of accounts. As per assessee's submission during survey total sales /\nreceipts during FY 2010-11 relevant

KANAK KUMAR JAIN L/H OF PARTNER OF M/S. KESARIYAJI FILLING STATION,UDAIPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 66/JODH/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur01 May 2025AY 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Lodha (CA)For Respondent: Shri Karni Dan, Addl. CIT

Section 133ASection 148Section 154Section 189(3)Section 234ASection 234CSection 250Section 292BSection 42

133A of the IT\nAct was conducted on 03.12.2016 at the business premises of the firm situated at Rishabdeo.\nDuring and post survey proceedings the ADIT (Inv.)-II, Udaipur found that assessee firm was\nnot maintaining any books of accounts. As per assessee's submission during survey total sales /\nreceipts during FY 2010-11 relevant

KANAK KUMAR JAIN L/H OF PARTNER OF M/S. KESARIYAJI FILLING STATION,UDAIPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 63/JODH/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur01 May 2025AY 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Lodha (CA)For Respondent: Shri Karni Dan, Addl. CIT

Section 133ASection 148Section 154Section 189(3)Section 234ASection 234CSection 250Section 292BSection 42

133A of the IT\nAct was conducted on 03.12.2016 at the business premises of the firm situated at Rishabdeo.\nDuring and post survey proceedings the ADIT (Inv.)-II, Udaipur found that assessee firm was\nnot maintaining any books of accounts. As per assessee's submission during survey total sales /\nreceipts during FY 2010-11 relevant

KANAK KUMAR JAIN L/H OF PARTNER OF M/S. KESARIYAJI FILLING STATION,UDAIPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 65/JODH/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur01 May 2025AY 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Lodha (CA)For Respondent: Shri Karni Dan, Addl. CIT

Section 133ASection 148Section 154Section 189(3)Section 234ASection 234CSection 250Section 292BSection 42

133A of the IT\nAct was conducted on 03.12.2016 at the business premises of the firm situated at Rishabdeo.\nDuring and post survey proceedings the ADIT (Inv.)-II, Udaipur found that assessee firm was\nnot maintaining any books of accounts. As per assessee's submission during survey total sales /\nreceipts during FY 2010-11 relevant

MAHARAJA GANGA MAHAL,BIKANER vs. ITO, TD,, BIKANER

In the result, all the appeals are partly allowed

ITA 83/JODH/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur18 Sept 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Vice- & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Sh. Shafi Mohd. Chouhan, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. Rajeev Mohan, JCIT-DR

Section 133ASection 194ASection 194A(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 201(1)

133A (2A) of the Act was conducted in the business premises of the assessee on 18.01.2019. In course of survey, it was found that the assessee has not deducted tax at source on laundry payment of Rs.4,28,663/-. It was further observed that the assessee has not deducted tax at source on payment of interest of Rs.6

MAHARAJA GANGA MAHAL,BIKANER vs. ITO, TD,, BIKANER

In the result, all the appeals are partly allowed

ITA 85/JODH/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur18 Sept 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Vice- & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Sh. Shafi Mohd. Chouhan, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. Rajeev Mohan, JCIT-DR

Section 133ASection 194ASection 194A(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 201(1)

133A (2A) of the Act was conducted in the business premises of the assessee on 18.01.2019. In course of survey, it was found that the assessee has not deducted tax at source on laundry payment of Rs.4,28,663/-. It was further observed that the assessee has not deducted tax at source on payment of interest of Rs.6

MAHARAJA GANGA MAHAL,BIKANER vs. ITO, TD,, BIKANER

In the result, all the appeals are partly allowed

ITA 84/JODH/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur18 Sept 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Vice- & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Sh. Shafi Mohd. Chouhan, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. Rajeev Mohan, JCIT-DR

Section 133ASection 194ASection 194A(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 201(1)

133A (2A) of the Act was conducted in the business premises of the assessee on 18.01.2019. In course of survey, it was found that the assessee has not deducted tax at source on laundry payment of Rs.4,28,663/-. It was further observed that the assessee has not deducted tax at source on payment of interest of Rs.6