BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “TDS”+ Section 80P(1)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai133Bangalore57Raipur51Pune27Delhi23Visakhapatnam18Kolkata17Ahmedabad10Chennai9Surat9Jaipur8Lucknow8Nagpur6Cochin6Karnataka5Indore2Jodhpur2Amritsar1Kerala1Hyderabad1Panaji1Varanasi1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 194C10Section 201(1)6Section 133A2Deduction2TDS2Survey u/s 133A2

DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FOREST FOREST BHILWARA,BHILWARA vs. CIT, DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 98/JODH/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur02 Nov 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Sunil Porwal, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Meenakshi Vohra, CIT-DR
Section 133ASection 194CSection 201(1)

B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member: The present appeals have been filed by the assessee against the orders of National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 23.01.2023 2. Since, the issue involved in both the appeals are similar, they were heard together and being adjudicated by a common order. 3. In ITA No. 98/Jodh/2023, following grounds have been raised

DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FOREST FOREST BHILWARA,BHILWARA vs. CIT APPEAL, DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 99/JODH/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur02 Nov 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Sunil Porwal, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Meenakshi Vohra, CIT-DR
Section 133ASection 194CSection 201(1)

B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member: The present appeals have been filed by the assessee against the orders of National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 23.01.2023 2. Since, the issue involved in both the appeals are similar, they were heard together and being adjudicated by a common order. 3. In ITA No. 98/Jodh/2023, following grounds have been raised