BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 58(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,482Mumbai1,432Bangalore683Chennai476Kolkata317Hyderabad215Ahmedabad200Indore165Raipur163Cochin154Jaipur151Karnataka148Chandigarh126Pune69Lucknow57Visakhapatnam56Surat45Cuttack37Ranchi29Rajkot23Dehradun19Agra16Nagpur15Guwahati13Telangana13Patna13Allahabad10Amritsar9Varanasi8SC7Jabalpur5Panaji4Calcutta4Jodhpur3Uttarakhand2Punjab & Haryana2Kerala1

Key Topics

Section 194Q4TDS3Disallowance3Section 44A2Section 143(1)2Section 402Deduction2

BHIKHAM CHAND MOHTA HUF,HANUMANGARH JUNCTION vs. ITO WARD - 1, HANUMANGARH, HANUMANGARH

Appeals of the assessee are allowed in the manner discussed as above

ITA 505/JODH/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur17 Jun 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon'Ble & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon'Ble

Section 143(1)Section 194QSection 44A

58,911/- out of Rs. 2,72,207/- in respect with assessment year 2022-23. Thus disallowed the claim of TDS on the ground that gross receipts as per form 26AS is more than that of what were shown in the ITR. This appears due to TDS deducted by the buyer under section 194Q of the Income

BHIKHAM CHAND MOHTA HUF,HANUMANGARH vs. ITO WARD - 1, HANUMANGARH, HANUMANGARH

Appeals of the assessee are allowed in the manner discussed as above

ITA 506/JODH/2024[2023-24]Status: Disposed
ITAT Jodhpur
17 Jun 2025
AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon'Ble & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon'Ble

Section 143(1)Section 194QSection 44A

58,911/- out of Rs. 2,72,207/- in respect with assessment year 2022-23. Thus disallowed the claim of TDS on the ground that gross receipts as per form 26AS is more than that of what were shown in the ITR. This appears due to TDS deducted by the buyer under section 194Q of the Income

ACIT, PAOTA C ROAD vs. VARAHA INFRA LIMITED, PAOTA B ROAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 160/JODH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur01 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Rathod Kamlesh Jayantbhaithe Acit Vs M/S. Vardha Infra Ltd. Room No. 215, Aayakar Bhawan 6 Jalam Vilas Scheme Paota C Road, Jodhpur Paota B Road, Jodhpur (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaccv 7972 K

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40

4,28,36,27,201/- as it was in immediately preceding year. The reasons for this down fall as is explained by the assessee reads as under : "Decrease in contract receipts is approximately 42.40% as compared to last year. All work contracts are allotted on the basis of tender system. It is further submitted that in this line of business