BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “TDS”+ Section 264clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi326Mumbai292Bangalore135Karnataka88Kolkata72Chennai67Hyderabad46Jaipur40Ahmedabad33Chandigarh32Indore25Cuttack17Lucknow16Pune15Cochin8Surat7Dehradun7SC6Visakhapatnam6Raipur6Jodhpur5Guwahati4Varanasi4Telangana4Amritsar3Allahabad3Nagpur3Agra3Patna2Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 271E9Section 271C6Section 2504Limitation/Time-bar4Section 153A3Section 143(3)3Section 269T3Section 275(1)(c)3Addition to Income3Section 246

MANISH SHARMA,KOTA vs. JCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, UDAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 619/JODH/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur25 Jun 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Date Of Hearing.

Section 132(1)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 250Section 269TSection 271DSection 271E

264. However, the present case is not subject to revisionary proceeding. Therefore, the clause is also not applicable for calculating period of limitation for imposing penalty. 3 (c) This clause is residuary clause and applicable when above both clause are not applicable. Since the clauses (a) and (b) of sub-section (1) 11 Shri Manish Sharma, Kota. of section

2
Penalty2
Search & Seizure2

ITO, TDS-2, JODHPUR, JODHPUR vs. RAJENDRA KUMBHAT, HUF, JODHPUR

In the result, the appeal of the Revenuebearing ITA No

ITA 34/JODH/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur12 Oct 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 246Section 246ASection 250Section 253Section 271CSection 274Section 275(1)(c)

TDS), Jodhpur and submissions of the appellant. There are two issues to be adjudicated upon; firstly, whether the penalty is time barred and secondly. whether the AO was right in imposing the penalty of Rs.6,000/-. To appreciate issue in better perspective, it is imperative to recapitulate the S.275 which is reads as under:- Bar of limitation for imposing penalties

SUBHASH CHAND JAIN ,JODHPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 112/JODH/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur28 Jan 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

Section 250

TDS on interest paid to Smt Mona Jain. In view of the provisions of the Act, we are of the considered opinion that no disallowance is required to be made and sustained u/s 40 (A) (ia) of the Act on account of interest paid. Hence, we direct to delete the same. 19. Now we take ITA No. 112/Jodh/2020

SUBHASH CHAND JAIN ,JODHPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 111/JODH/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur28 Jan 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

Section 250

TDS on interest paid to Smt Mona Jain. In view of the provisions of the Act, we are of the considered opinion that no disallowance is required to be made and sustained u/s 40 (A) (ia) of the Act on account of interest paid. Hence, we direct to delete the same. 19. Now we take ITA No. 112/Jodh/2020

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, BIKANER vs. SMT. ALPANA GUPTA, SRIGANGANAGAR

In the result, this appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 45/JODH/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur01 Feb 2021AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwala.C.I.T. Vs. Smt. Alpana Gupta, 4-A-15, Central Circle, Jawahar Nagar, Bikaner. Sriganganagar. Pan No. Aiepg 8893 R

Section 40

section 194A is not applicable. Similarly, the Coordinate Bench of the Ahmadabad Tribunal in the case of Omkara Impex and Merchandise Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO (2018) 53 CCH 0201 (Ahd.) (Trib.) has held that discounting charges are outside the 11 ITA 45/Jodh/2019 ACIT Vs Smt. Alpana Gupta. purview of interest expenses, therefore, in our considered view, the question of making