Search: TDS | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “TDS”+ Section 245clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi326 Mumbai312 Bangalore201 Chennai93 Karnataka90 Kolkata78 Ahmedabad54 Cochin38 Chandigarh35 Pune33 Jaipur33 Ranchi28 Indore26 Cuttack23 Raipur22 Surat18 Hyderabad16 Visakhapatnam13 Lucknow13 Rajkot9 Amritsar5 SC5 Dehradun5 Telangana4 Jodhpur4 Guwahati3 Allahabad2 Calcutta1 Agra1 Nagpur1 Panaji1 Patna1 Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 194I14 Section 201(1)4 Section 2014 Section 2634 Section 143(3)3 TDS3 Section 402 Addition to Income2 Deduction2

DALPAT SINGH NANECHA,BHILWARA vs. ITO, TDS, BHILWARA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

ITA 246/JODH/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur16 Aug 2021AY 2015-16

For Appellant: Shri Hemant Chhajed (C.A.)For Respondent: Miss Kajal Singh (CIT) a

Section 194ISection 201Section 201(1)

245 &246/JODH/2019 3 Rajesh Kumar Nahar & Othrs.vs. ITO(TDS) Section 194IA of the Act and has wrongly held the assessee

RAJESH KUMAR NAHAR,BHILWARA vs. ITO, TDS, BHILWARA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

ITA 245/JODH/2019[2015-16]Status: Disposed

ITAT Jodhpur

16 Aug 2021

AY 2015-16

For Appellant: Shri Hemant Chhajed (C.A.)For Respondent: Miss Kajal Singh (CIT) a

Section 194ISection 201Section 201(1)

245 &246/JODH/2019 3 Rajesh Kumar Nahar & Othrs.vs. ITO(TDS) Section 194IA of the Act and has wrongly held the assessee

ACIT, PAOTA C ROAD vs. VARAHA INFRA LIMITED, PAOTA B ROAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 160/JODH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur01 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Rathod Kamlesh Jayantbhaithe Acit Vs M/S. Vardha Infra Ltd. Room No. 215, Aayakar Bhawan 6 Jalam Vilas Scheme Paota C Road, Jodhpur Paota B Road, Jodhpur (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaccv 7972 K

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40

sections is mandatory but consequential to Income. The A O is directed to allow consequential relief to the assessee while giving effect to this appeal order. 9 The fifth ground of appeal is as under "The Ld. AO has erred in initiating penalty proceedings uis 274 and 271(1)(C) 9.1 The initiation of penalty is not appealable. The ground

SUNITA AGARWAL,BIKANER vs. PCIT-1, JODHPUR

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 25/JODH/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur07 Oct 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Hon’Ble Sh. Sandeep Gosain & Hon’Ble Sh. Vikram Singh Yadavassessment Year: 2016-17 Sunita Agarwal, Vs. Pr.Cit-1, 98, Industrial Area, Jodhpur. Bikaner. Pan No. Aeopa 9467 R

Section 115Section 131Section 143(3)Section 263

Section 269T restricts repayment of loan, deposit or specified advance if the amount exceeds Rs 20000 or more. In the instant case there has not been any repayment of the nature specified above. There is rather advancement by the assessee hence the provision of sec. 269T are not trigerred. Issue 4 Non examination of unsecured loan from Shri Virendra Agarwal