SARDA DEVI CHECHANI,UDAIPUR vs. ITO TDS , UDAIPU

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

2) Agri./Group-2/75 dt. 27.10.2014 of State of Rajasthan is taken as the base for the meaning of forest produce”. Vide page 3-6 of the assessment order. 1.3 Thus first time in the year 2015 i.e on 14.09.2015 Phuwar has been defined as “minor forest produce” by the state Govt. . If before 14.09.2015 it was not falling

SARDA DEVI CHECHANI,UDAIPUR vs. ITO TDS, UDAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

2) Agri./Group-2/75 dt. 27.10.2014 of State of Rajasthan is taken as the base for the meaning of forest produce”. Vide page 3-6 of the assessment order. 1.3 Thus first time in the year 2015 i.e on 14.09.2015 Phuwar has been defined as “minor forest produce” by the state Govt. . If before 14.09.2015 it was not falling

M/S. NOKHA AGRO SERVICES,,BIKANER vs. PR. CIT, , BIKANER

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri R.C.Sharma & Shri Sandeep Gosainm/S Nokha Agro Services, 18 Vs Pr. Commissioner Of Income Km Stone, Nh-15, Tax, Sriganganagar Road, Bikaner. Bikaner. (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaffn 8164 R

153/- from FDR with Punjab National Bank and DCBL and Interest on advances to parties. The net interest of Rs. 75,81,296/- charged to Profit and Loss as expenditure. In the course of assessment preceding the learned A.O. has accepted the claim of interest (Net) only after 6 ITA 171/Johd/2018 Nokha Agro Services Vs PCIT satisfaction that interest received