SARDA DEVI CHECHANI,UDAIPUR vs. ITO TDS, UDAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

TDS Ward Udaipur. The ld. AO has alleged that the assessee has filed the reply on dt. 17.09.2018 and filed the audit report, balance sheet, P&L account and copy of form 27C F.Y. 2011-12 but not filed for F.Y 2010-11. 3. The ld. AO has stated that Since the IT Act, 1961 or General Clauses

DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FOREST FOREST BHILWARA,BHILWARA vs. CIT, DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

establishes anything contrary to the provisions of section 194C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. There are two parties i.e. State of Rajasthan and VFPMC and VFPMCs are carrying out the work which is assigned to them through GO F7(39)Van/90/ dated 17.10.2000 issued by Rajasthan State Government and subsequent Instructions and the work done by VFPMCs

DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FOREST FOREST BHILWARA,BHILWARA vs. CIT APPEAL, DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

establishes anything contrary to the provisions of section 194C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. There are two parties i.e. State of Rajasthan and VFPMC and VFPMCs are carrying out the work which is assigned to them through GO F7(39)Van/90/ dated 17.10.2000 issued by Rajasthan State Government and subsequent Instructions and the work done by VFPMCs